Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Type d'opération
Date (Année)

2062 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP03449 ((56). Autour du Golfe du Morbihan, les landes de Lanvaux et le sud de la vallée de la Vilaine. Rapport de PD 2016)
  • are evident in the results from M3. Responses of possible interest are indicated, mainly in the central and western region of survey (12 & 13). The archaeological significance of these anomalies is uncertain. Insufficient survey area available in M3 and an abundance of modern ferrous
  • Coet Sürho: alluvial soils overlying granite and gneiss Pen Castel: rendzinas overlying granite Recent discovery of mediaeval ceramic and building debris at Coet Sürho (Muzillac) suggests the locations of 2 potential medieval settlements dating th th from the 13 -15 century. Survey
  • land/property divisions which are still indicated on the project mapping. 3.1.4 Numerous week trends are evident throughout this survey location, some of which are rectilinear in form. These are at the limits of instrument detection and their potential archaeological significance
  • remains uncertain. 3.1.5 3.1.6 3.1.7 M2 No responses of definite archaeological character have been recorded from survey in M2. Poorly defined negatives 11 to the N likely represent variations in soil morphology/geology. M3 No responses of definite archaeological character
  • locations M2-M3 at Coet Sürho display no responses of obvious archaeological character. Interpretation of the results from M3 has been particularly hampered due to numerous trees which prevented complete survey coverage. 4.3 Interpretation of the results from survey at Pen Castel
  • building footprints 18, 19 and 23 to the N/NE and E, and a linear arrangement of responses to the S/SW. The potential that a large ferrous response NE of survey centre in the Pen Castel results has masked areas of significant archaeological response should not be dismissed. RÉFÉRENCES
  • Bartington Instruments, Operation Manual for Grad601 Single Axis Magnetic Gradiometers (OM1800). Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM), English Heritage 2008, Geophysical survey in archaeological field evaluation, Research & Professional Guideline
  • GÉOPHYSIQUE TAG FR16011 COET SÜRHO (MUZILLAC) ET PEN CASTEL (ARZON), MORBIHAN (56), FRANCE Coordonnées (RGF93CC48) Lieu des relevés Coet Sürho: 1289652 7160206 et 1290069 7159919 Pen Castel: 1258800 7167622 Geophysical survey was undertaken in the village of Coet Sürho, c.5.6km SE
  • of Muzillac, and on Pointe St-Nicolas at Pen Castel, 2km NE of Arzon, in Département Morbihan (56), southern Brittany (France). Two sites of suspected medieval origin were investigated at Coet Sürho, covering a total 4 survey locations (M1-M4), situated E & W of a minor road. Survey at Pen
  • locations M1-M4 focused on investigating these 2 sites. Archéologie Méthodologie The survey at Pen Castel (Arzon) focused on the interior of a known promontory fort (56 005 0015/0016), which occupies the northernmost region of Pointe St-Nicolas. The fort is defined by a variety
  • d’investigation prédéfinis, et de fournir une interprétation archéologique des anomalies géophysiques enregistrées. The results of this research will be used to inform the client’s future proposals for archaeological investigation at each site. DETAILS DU PROJET Client Auteur Date de la
  • Castel, échelle 1/1250 2 2.1 ACCÈS, CONDITIONS AU SOL ET CONSIDÉRATIONS GÉNÉRALES Survey in M1-4 at Coet Sürho extended through mainly accessible arable and pasture sloping gently to the N/NE. Complete survey coverage in M3 was made impossible due to obstruction from numerous
  • small-scale ferrous responses are evident throughout the results from both survey at Coet Sürho (M1-4) and Pen Castel. These mostly represent modern ferrous debris contained within the topsoil and are not discussed in the results section of the report unless deemed relevant. Large
  • concentrations of ferrous response at Coet Sürho in locations M3-4 derive from survey in proximity to existing boundaries and farm buildings. Broad regions of ferrous response from survey in proximity to existing boundaries are also evident in the Pen Castel survey results. One substantial
  • /negative responses from natural soil/geological variation also extend throughout the survey results from Pen Castel. The range of this variation has significantly complicated interpretation of the Pen Castel survey results. Client CERAM Coet Sürho (Muzillac) et Pen Castel (Arzon
  • ), Morbihan (56), France 3 4 RESULTATS DE MAGNETOMETRIE 3.1 3.1.1 COET SÜRHO M1 Probable building remains (1), visible as a concentration of broad negative responses, have been identified E of survey centre in M1. Remains of a possible outlying property boundary (2-4), mostly
  • . Poorly defined broad negatives to the SE (7) & NW (8) are also evident and may be archaeological in origin. However, a natural soil/geological explanation for anomalies 5-8 should not be dismissed. 3.1.3 Responses 9 & 10 to the E in M1 likely represent ploughed out remains of former
  • responses has made interpretation of the results from M3 uncertain. M4 No responses of definite archaeological character are evident in the results from M4. Potentially signficant responses are indicated to the NW (14), NE (15) and S/SW (16). Response group 15 to the E may represent
  • The southern corner of a suspected Mediaeval building foundation (17) is evident to the N in the results from survey at Pen Castel. Potential further building footprints may be present to the NE (18 & 19), although these represent weak linear/sub-angular patterns which are barely visible
  • CERAM Coet Sürho (Muzillac) et Pen Castel (Arzon), Morbihan (56), France 5 trends, notably 21 and 22, which may indicate divisions within the fort; and a sub-rectangular group of negative anomalies (23), potentially a building footprint, shortly E of survey centre. 3.2.3
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • by the early post médiéval period (Asti 11 and Davies 1985s 92-5, 97)» If the occupation in T4 is prehistoric then it is the first of its kind for the? région and has important implications for survey work» Its low-lying position, in a wet valley bottom and sealed by 70cm of colluvium
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1986 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EASTER AND SEPTEMBER SEASONS 1986 Easter Season 2 Fi el dwal ki ng at 50m intervais 2 Fi g . A 3 Sampling outside the core 6 7 Fig. B Excavations Al 16 8 Fi g. C 10 September Season Fi g
  • and labour patterns» The complète fieldwork programme consists of systemaitic fieldwalking of ail available ploughed fields within the four core communes of Ruffiac, St-Nicolas, Tré'al and Carentoir, together with sélective geophysical and geochemical surveys, and smal 1 excavations
  • to test results5 complementary envi ronment al analysis is also being undertaken, as is a survey of ail standing buildings in the core. The complète study involves (amongst other éléments) analysis of documents, including the very détail ed cadastral maps and records of the early
  • intervais, using collection units of 100m; field EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1986 | TRANSECT J TRANSECT B "t— TRANSECT D TRANSECT A TRANSECT E -h— .y. : 75 m ■ ci3 " S Y •m .o-v. Tréal Lo 50ml—' O O .... □ ; C? (Rutfiac g SO TRANSECT G l'ï «2. cm. fl\ □ 1-5km apart
  • contrast black and pink/purple roofing fragments occurred together in zones immediately north of the Ruffiac basin and west of the Trelo zone. It was also possible, in some cases, to distinguish a range of other schi stes that were imported from nearby local sources, probably as walling
  • , transects within the core. Ail available fields Transect for we>re covered; tl 11s ran 10km slightly west of N of from the north-west Ruffiac, and passed north , boundary communes of Carc , Reminiac and Augan the and into the through south oi Zampefrieac, running just to the w est
  • eux to Ville Glâird area. There are large 'blank' zones from La Ravraie to Le Boulay and also north west of Augan, although such zones are not so character i st i c of the commune boundaries as they are in the core communes. Se h i stes in gênerai re-f lect the pinker colour
  • in the core, and more are on south- (32.7), north(18.47.) and west--facing (12.27.) slopes - again reflecting the h i g h er t op og r ap h y „ Excavations. Al 16 Excavation was designed to sample the medieva\l settlement. of Al 16, located by fieldwalking and classified as a "site
  • . The first (T7) ran north west from T3 across a slight break in si ope, and the other two (T5 and T6) were eut in order to section the platform near T4 (see fig. C) . The-? sections were cleaned and drawn and features in the bottom of the trenches recorded. The two 6m squares were mai ni
  • of blocks of a similar character were noted in the machine trenches, widely dispersed over the field, they could be natural features» T7, a 13m~long, lm--wide, north-west extension to T3, located a shallow ditch eut into the natural. It had a sloping bottom (50 cm wide) and was fi lied
  • from the north-west corner of T4 and eut the edge of the earthwork platform at right angles; the other (T6) was 23m long and ran from the south-east corner of T4 to the southern end of the platform. A section of the whole earthwork was thus obt ai ned . The earliest évidence came
  • and fairly even distribution of médiéval and post-medi eval pottery. Although there were areas of slightly higher concentration, the scatter looked like a manuring scatter.. H145 is a flat field that is located near the crest of an exposed south-facing ridge on the south--west edge
  • of the settlement of Quoiqueneuc in Treal , in the area of a smal 1 n i nth-cent ury monastery. The field is bounded to the north by the main east-west road leading to Quoiqueneuc, and to the west by the road to Le Passai r. The ancien cadastre shows H145 to have been within an area of largely
  • (from east to west s T23 , T24 , Iron Age pottery could be T25) , suc h that the areas producing of the trenches were cleaned by hand and tested. The si des part of the plough soil was excavated by recorded; the lowest features located thereby. The trenches were hand, as were
  • by the time the macadam road surface had been laid over it. The ditch may have acted as a drain or boundary for the holloway. T26 was eut to the north west of T23 to check that thèse features constituted a road: the same séquence of levels was recorded. Comment The résulte of thèse limited
  • the first trench was placed over one of the 'concentrations' of Iron Age pottery. Initial ly ai 6m square (T15) was excavated as at Al 16, A92 and H145, and then five trenches (1 mètre wide) were eut north-south across the field at 30m intervais using a machine (from west to east. T16/17
  • activities taking place within small enclosures beyond the residential area» One possible interprétation of H80, then, is that it was the site of a late prehistoric settlement, the focus of which lay in the west of HSO and beyond it, with associated enclosures to the east » A92
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY: QUST-VILAINE UATERSHED REPORT ON FIELDWORK IN MARCH-APRIL 1985 The fourth season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, multi-discipl inary study of the rel ati onshi p between land-use and seulement during the last two thousand years, took
  • , and the effects of such changes on social groupings and labour patterns. The complète fieldwork programme consists of systematic fieldwalking of ail available ploughed fields within the four communes, together with sélective geophysical and geochemical surveys, and small excavation
  • ; in addition, environmental analysis and a survey of standing buildings is being undertaken. The larger study involves (amongst other éléments) analysis of documents, including the very detailed cadastral maps and records of the early nineteenth century (Asti 1 1 and Davies 1982a, 1982b
  • collection; phosphate analysis and soil magnetic susceptibil ity survey of the four selected areas; and excavation of part of a bank and lynchet near a field from which 'total' collection had previously been made. Three days (21-23 March) were spent in préparation by three people
  • to concentrate upon the excavation. Overall , 434 mandays were spent on this year's season, including travelling time and time off; 364 of thèse were working days. Two of the main team spent most of their time assisting in a survey of standing buildings already in hand when the season started
  • in the Coet Morel /Hôtel Orl and area (Carentoir). Surface material is markedly absent from fields on the northern and southern boundaries of L, on the east/west ridges (particularly on a band north west of Carentoir) and - as might be expected - on most steep slopes. There are again
  • /grey and red/yellow) and three sizes (1.5cm) in an attempt to find criteria for distinguishing between local and imported material. A107 lies just below a flat, exposed hilltop on a south-facing slope 75-80m high. The area was arable when the cadastral survey
  • contour in a flat area. In the early nineteenth century it 1 ay on a track and was part of a block of arable in the ' château landscape' associated with La Meule, 125m to the west (a landscape where seigneurial 1 and management introduced distinctive rectangular field shapes, greater
  • ) and 6.36 fragments of brick and tile (115.57g). The assemblage included second-century central Gaulish Samian and rims of third/fourth-century types; thirty-eight pièces of tegul a and twenty-nine of imbrex; three pièces of haematite (310g) and two worked flints. Magnetic susceptibil
  • ity readings did not vary much, but although médiéval and post-medieval pottery were gênerai ly distributed over the field, both Roman wares and brick and tile cl ustered in the north-west quarter. Although quantities of Roman pottery were small, those of brick and tile were
  • unusually large, and their distribution, together with the nature of the assemblage, suggests that the field once contained a Roman-period structure. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery, by contrast, probably arrived as a resuit of manuring. B216 lies on a slight north-west si ope at 65m
  • usters of other classes of material. 5 Excavations (EBS85 Tl and T2) Small -scale excavation of earthworks was undertaken in order to begin investigation of the soils and archaeology within field boundaries near sites identified in fieldwalking. As indicated previously, one
  • part of the valley, is an area of permanent pasture in which there is a prominent bank and a possible platform (see fig. 2). The bank runs diagonally across the valley bottom. 130m to the west of this bank, at the bottom of the south-facing slope of the valley, is a pronounced
  • of phosphate concentrations at the deserted médiéval settlement at Kerlano. This site, partially excavated by M. Patrick André nearly twenty years ago, is located in the granité upland of the Landes de Lanvaux, 30km west of the study area, and is the nearest known surviving médiéval
  • settlement (André 1974). At least one building in the settlement had a central hearth, and middens (represented by pottery dumps) were located around the buildings immediately outside their walls. In an attempt to understand phosphate concentrations and magnetic susceptibil i ty readings
  • with that generated by survey undertaken around St Malo by the Centre Régional Archéologique d'Alet. Similarities in some of the médiéval fabrics were noted, and there was a striking visual similarity between fabric 10 and pottery from a kiln found at Guipel ( 1 1 1 e et Vilaine). The kiln
  • produced an archeomagnetic date of 895-945 AD. A survey of ail standing buildings has been in progress in the study area since October 1984, undertaken by Pete Addison, working as a fui 1 -time research assistant. To date, 4000 buildings have been recorded on standardised recording
  • . Meanwhile Pete Addison will complète the survey of standing buildings; a small team will dévote February, March and April to 'total' collection; analysis of pollens from the Mauffrais podsols and the River Aff \1 backswamps will continue; and work on the local schistes will be pursued
  • intermittently by Wendy Davies. In the Easter season transects with uneven coverage will be rewalked, especially the northern part of E and parts of A and B, to achieve a relatively even survey of ail parts of the study area. The process of sampling the surrounding communes will be begun
  • ; without their help much of this year's season would have been impossible and we are therefore immensely grateful to them. Fieldwalking and excavation were financed by the British Academy, the Society of Antiquaries of London, the University of Reading, the University of London Central
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1987 PU EAST BRITTANY SURVEY - OUST/VILAINE WATERSHED EASTER 1987 The seventh season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul ti -di sci pl i nary study of the relationship between 1 and-use and settlement during the last two thousand
  • as, Treal and Carentoir, together with sélective geophysical and geochemical surveys, and small excavations to test results; compl ementary envi ronmental analysis is also being undert aken , as is a sùrvey of ail standing buildings in the core. The complète study involves (amongst other
  • ) Sampling was organized in three 2km transects radiating from the core (P, M and R) and thèse were wal ked in the same way as Transects A to L within the core and Transect N outside it, in 1982-6. Transect P ran due west to the River Oust for 4.1km from the western boundary of Ruffiac
  • two groups of 'blank' fields south east and south west of Comblessac. Together thèse zones suggest that the settlement of Comblessac and its immediately dépendent arable may have been rather small, much smaller than the centres in the core communes: it is notable that a tile
  • . Thereafter, although there are a few 'blank' fields in the nei ghbourhood of Pipriac it is again marked that there are very few from Pipriac east to the Vilaine. The contrast between this area and that to the west of it is very striking. The distribution of material in relation
  • . In P concentrations tended to lie on south-, south-eastor south-west—f aci ng slopes (48.17.) or on those facing west. (11.17.) - south-west especially; i n M they tended to lie on north-, north-east-or north-west-f aci ng slopes (36.97.) or, southand sDuth-west-f aci ng slopes
  • significant. In Transect P there are none of thèse materials on the high ground west of Ruffiac boundary, precisely in those areas which produced no surface pottery either; there are also no pink schi stes in and around Malestroit and close to the River Oust. In Transect M there are none
  • Emailleries. It seems highly likely that most of this transect, beyond its western parts, lay beyond the normal area of distribution of this material, whose source we have recently localized to quarries immediately south west of Guer. In Transect R there were no 'roofing' schi stes
  • Roman settlements in Missiriac (P) and Comblessac (R) . In Missiriac the scatter associated with the excavated bath-house at Bermagouet continuée! to the west of the excavation for at least 250m (Gallia 1977: 346-7). In Comblessac, a field (R9) , adjacent to the field near Le Mur
  • then - between October and January 19B7 - undertook the index ing and organisation of this material, together with basic analysis of démographie data she had previously collected. Ail data from the survey of standing buildings has been put on dise, ready for analysis in the coming year
  • . Fieldwalking of the sample transects, as also total collection in the core, were 7 financed by the Leverhulme Trust, with some additional assistance from the University of London Central Research Fund and the University of Reading; archive work was financed by a grant from the British
  • provided financial support. G. G. Astill Department of Archaeology University of Reading Whi tekni ghts Reading RG6 2AA Wendy Davies Department of History University Collège London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT 9 July 1987 REFERENCES Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1982 'Un nouveau programme
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EAST BRITTANY SURVEY SEPTEMBER Introduction B409 (Carentoir ZA161) Fig. A92 1, 2 (Ruffiac ZK67) Fig. A3 1/79 3 (Ruffiac ZN119) Fig. 4 Fig. 5 H 132 (Ruffiac ZL40) Fig. 674 6 (Carentoir YB29) Fig. 7 L26 (Ruffiac YA224) Fi g . 8 D153
  • (Carentoir YK5) Fig. 9 Fig. 10 General Comment Acknowl edgements Références SEASQN 1988 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY - OUST/ VILAINE WATERSHED SEPTEMBER 1988 The eighth and 1 ast season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul ti -di sci pl i nary study
  • the four communes named above, and sampling of fields in the surrounding communes, together with sélective geophysical and geochemical survey, and smal 1 excavations to test results; compl ementa.ry envi r onmental analysis is al so being undertaken . The fieldwalking programme
  • was completed in 1987, and a survey of ail standing buildings in the core in 1986. The complète study involves (amongst other éléments) analysis of documents, including the very détail ed cadastral maps and records of the early ni neteenth century. Thèse latter analyses have been completed
  • , and only two days were lost because of rain; however , the gênerai dryness meant that the ground was hard and made for very heavy working. EBS 88 B409 (Carentoir Zft 161) B409 lies on a west-facing si ope near the settlement of Le Eiois Guillaume, documentée! from the eighteenth
  • ) was si ted in the north-east part of the field where there was a coïncidence of pre— medi eval and médiéval pottery. A test pi t (T37) was also dug in the south west , over a squar e wh i c h had produced n o t. a b 1 e qu ant i t i e s of pre- medi eval pottery and brick and tile
  • some pièces were 5mm across. This layer varied in thickness -from 0.75m on the eastern, up-slope, side o-f the trench to 0.38m on the west. At the east end the top sur-face o-f 2 curved as i -f the layer had been mounded up. This layer could not be total ly excavated over the whole
  • 2 and to the présent ground surface, that is it occurred at a higher level in the west end of T36 and sloped down to the east. It was on this surface that a spindle whorl of soft brown-yellow mudstone was found. Trench 37 The plough soil (13) was removed in three 0.1m spits
  • of charcoal would suggest a quick and deliberate backfill of this ditch. There was, however, a patch of charcoal (20) in the upper part of 16 at the west end of the ditch. No pottery was recovered from the upper fill but in context 17 were a near-compl ete terra-ni qra bowl with a foot
  • the proximity of the Roman buildings. The si des and bottom of the trenches were cleaned manually. Ihe extent of the trenches was limited by the track and modem drainage pipes. T42 was eut from the north-west corner of T28 due west for a 1 distance of 9m; T43 was eut due north from
  • of ceramic roof tile were recovered (43.88kg, 167 fragments), and the pottery consisted of 3 sherds of grey coarse ware and one sherd of central Gaul ish Samian. The absence of Ir on-Age f abri es and terra-ni qra-type pottery «and the présence of so much roofing material would suggest
  • ) were recovered from a few squares distributed throughout the field (21 out of 1383 squares). Brick and tile concentrated in the central area of the field, straddling the earthwork on the valley slope (fig. 5); thèse squares produced a maximum of 9 pièces each (0.5kg). The médiéval
  • ) by machine in order to understand a feature. The archaeological préservation was of varying quality; features were only located if they penetrated the natural subsoil. On the ridge and top of the slope the features had clearly been truncated by ploughing so that few were deeper than 0.1
  • soil varied from 0.15m on the top of the ridge (the south-west end of T40) to 0.4m at the north-east, down-slope, end. The plough soil (57, 78) overlay the natural clay subsoil (79), into which features had been eut. The shallowness of the plough soil and regular ploughing probably
  • -west end of the trench) there was a collection of ditches and a pit, ail of which were filled with loam similar to the plough soil (2). The trench eut a ditch very obliquely: it was 0.5m deep and at least 0.6m wide and had a 'U' shaped profile (64: filled with 63). It appeared
  • to run east-west and it had been reçut, for' ditch 3 had removed the north side. The reçut ditch had a similar profile, was 0.6m wide and 0.4m deep. It contained an A31/79 Roman poMery f f Brick and tile o o o o OOOO O o 00 o o O o o 00 00 TV o o o 000 00 000 00 00 o o
  • of the plough soi 1 (47, 48) varied -from 0.15m at its south-west end to 0.46m at the bottom of the slope. As with the other trenches, ail -features were eut into the natural clay subsoil (28) and had fills that seemed to be derived -from the pl ough soi 1 . The southern part o-f the trench
  • in the opposite direction, farther west along the ridge; in that case the pits would lie in a zone between the residential area and the fields. The sherd of glass and that of (?) amphora might suggest a settlement with wealthy occupants. Ail this suggests that much of field A31 /79
  • the cluster of squares with much médiéval pottery and the stone scatter. When it became clear that structural évidence survived, the area was extended as far as the eut maize would allow to the south and south west (T38) . A test pit (T31) was also dug 15m east of the château in a field
  • : diameter lm, filled with 37) and a ditch, perhaps a drain, which ran diagonally across T32 (32: 0.8m wide, filled with 34); at its north-west end i t. was shallow and f 1 at-bottomed , but at the south east it had become deeper and had a 'V' shaped profile (fig. 6). Fi ve other post
RAP01961.pdf (bassin occidental de la Vilaine et centre Bretagne. rapport de prospection inventaire)
  • Photography in Italy (1899-2004) 15,30-16,00 M. Gojda Ancient Landscapes hidden and visible. Air Survey and Rethinking the History of Space and Seulement in Central Europe: towards a SynIhesis 16,00-16,30 Coffeebreak - Pause café To overcome infirmity: current approaches to aerial
  • of the Viking Age Seulement in Haithabu 09,30-10,00 M. Brown Aerial Survey and Designed Landscapes in Scotland 10,00-10,30 P. Horne The Flying Trowel 10,30-11,00 11,00-11,30 Z. Changcun, Y. Xinshi, Z. Bianlu, Aerial archaeological reconnaissance at Yangling, China J.W.E. Fassbinder
  • & H. Becker M. Schônherr Aerial Archaeology and new discoveries by a flying wing model 11,30-12,00 Coffeebreak - Pause café 3 o CQ —i Q) 3 3 CD 12,00-12,30 M. De Meyer 12,30-13,00 M. Lodewijckx, K. Verfaillie, I. Ro- Aerial survey in Eastern Flanders: a starl
  • . SanchezPalencia & A. Orejas T. Driver High peaks, deep valleys: Triumphs and challenges in surveying upland Wales from the air 10,30-11,00 N. Andrikopoulou-Strack Protecting the archaeological héritage by using aerial photographs - Chances and limits of an archaeological method 11,00
  • : exemples de Champagne et de Lorraine 15,30-16,00 P. Gilman & D. Buckley Aerial archaeology is of vital importance in the county of Essex (United Kingdom) 16,00-16,30 Coffeebreak - Pause café 16,30-17,00 R. H. Jones Surveying the Antonine Wall: Digital Intégration and Research
  • 17,00-17,30 M. Ziolkowski Photographie aérienne et satélitaire et prospection archéologique dans les Andes Centrales. 17,30-18,00 Final considérations - B. Bewley & J. Bourgeois S. Aleksejchouk 3D GIS in archaeology (Comprehensive approach in reconstruction of archaeological
  • Meyer Archaeological Research using Satellite Remote Sensing Techniques (Corona) in the Valleys of Shirwan and Chardawal, Iran M. Doneus & G. Scharrer Archaeological Feedback of the Aerial Archaeological Interprétation of an Early Médiéval Graveyard in Frohsdorf, Lower Austria. W
  • . Gheyle, J. Bourgeois, R. Goos- CORONA satellite imagery used for archaeological survey and detailed mapping of remote areas (Allai, Russia). sens, A. Dewulf & T. Willems M. Gautier Fermes antiques et parcellaires associés révélés par la photographie aérienne en Bretagne intérieure R
  • -West Germany Aerial photographies from the First World War: a contribution to the World War-archaeology in Belgium M. Willbertz Was ist eine Fundstelle? Qu'est-ce qu'un site? What is a site? H. von der Osten-Woldenburg Différent numerical and visual concepts for combining aerial
  • aristocratiques (Fig.7 et 8). A Mohon (56), le site de la Crosle photographié au sommet d'une ondulation et caractérisé par ses tracés très géométriques pourrait correspondre à un sanctuaire de l'Age du Fer. On remarquera surtout l'enclos interne avec sa grande fosse centrale et l'entrée
  • blé peuvent correspondre aux fossés d'un sanctuaire de la fin de l 'Age du Fer. On remarque une entrée aménagée à l 'est avec deux trous de poteaux et une grande fosse centrale dans l'enclos interne (04.07.03). 12 Fig. 1 0 - Ménéac (56). Bos Calers. Le site tel qu 'il se
  • - Cérémonie d'ouverture \:>.;, , ,,>\û i*\iyJ:d ihi >h>' M- ^ -- '•
  • 11,30-12,00 Coffeebreak - Pause café 12,00-12,30 W. Raczkowski 12,30-13,00 13,00-14,30 J. Bourgeois, M. Meganck & J. Se- Almost a century of Aerial Photography in Belgium. An overview mey Lunch 14,30-15,00 K. Brophy 15,00-15,30 G. Ceraudo 105 Years of Archaeological Aerial
  • archaeology in Poland The impact of aerial photography on Neolithic studies =3 03 16,30-17,00 I. Kuzma New discoveries in Slovakia 17,00-17,30 R. Schwarz Aerial reconnaissance in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany Thursday O CQ 1 0J 09,00-09,30 M. Doneus Aerial Archaeological Prospection
  • Photography and Trenchmaps 15,30-16,00 F. Vermeulen, M. Antrop, T. Wiedemann & B. Hageman F. Vermeulen, G. Verhoeven & J. Semey M. Willbertz 16,00-16,30 Coffeebreak - Pause café 16,30-17,00 Early médiéval fortifiée) sites in north-eastern Poland: a proposai for an archaeological
  • Systems in Flanders. The intégration of aerial photography and GIS in the Potenza Valley Survey (Italy) ADABweb - Base de données archéologiques sur l'inlranet du pays fédéral allemand Niedersachsen (Basse-Saxe) Vlapping the Médiéval agricultural traces with help of GIS and aerial
  • -11,30 Coffeebreak - Pause café 11,30-12,00 B. Cherretté & J. Bourgeois Circles for the dead. An archaeological inquiry into the Bronze Age in Flanders (2nd millennium BC) 12,00-12,30 0. Braasch Tracks and Traces Abroad 12,30-13,00 St. Bôdecker A polygon shaped ditch System
  • at Kalkar - a camp of the Legio I ? 13,00-14,00 Lunch 14,00-15,00 R. Goossens Tutorial: 3D analysis of satellite images for archaeology. The example of Corona, Quickbird, Ikonos and Aster 15,00-15,30 J. Vanmoerkerke Le rôle de la prospection aérienne dans l'archéologie actuelle
  • monuments) I. Bourgeois, J. Bourgeois & J. Se- Iran âge monuments in sandy Flanders (Belgium): rectangular ritual and funerary enclosures. A contribution from aerial photography mey I. Bourgeois, M. Meganck & J. Se- Enclos fossoyés de l'âge du fer en Flandre sablonneuse: vestiges de
  • fermes indigènes? mey G. Ceraudo Photogrammetry addressed to archaeology: the city map of Aquinum (Lazio - Italy) W. De Clercq & J. Semey And what about the farms ? Assessing the "aerial visibility" of the early historié seulement areas in the North-Western part of Flanders M. De
RAP03316.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Ménez-Dregan 1 : des Prénéandertaliens aux Néandertaliens à l'extrême ouest de l'Europe. Rapport de FP)
  • d’une centaine) effectués pour ces mêmes niveaux (4 et 5) montrent d’une façon générale une accumulation de pièces le long de la paroi à l’aplomb de la voûte et dans les deux diverticules (surtout le diverticule oriental), laissant ainsi une zone centrale plus ou moins dégagée, en
  • niveau de la zone centrale. L’ensemble des données archéologiques et spatiales contribuent à proposer le schéma suivant : les couches 9, 7 et 5 correspondraient à des occupations sur un laps de temps relativement important, partiellement en grotte ou protégées par des blocs effondrés
RAP03345.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil : Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP)
RAP03817 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de l'Holocène. Rapport de FP 2019)
RAP03661 (HOEDIC (56). Les derniers chasseurs-cueilleurs côtiers d'Europe atlantique et la mort : étude interdisciplinaire de la nécropole mésolithique de Hoedic)
  •   de  0,8  m.  Pour  résumer, deux mètres de dunes couvrent par endroit le site.     Cette  stratigraphie  pose  deux  problèmes  principaux,  qui  ont  de  fortes  implications  en  termes de compréhension de l’habitat :  ‐  Pourquoi n’y a‐t‐il pas de sol naturel sur le rocher
  •  caractériser géométriquement lʹenvironnement.     Une unité centrale SIR‐3000 de Systèmes de levés géophysiques inc. a été utilisée pour cette  campagne. (GSSI) (figure 11)     Figure 11 – Unité centrale SIR‐3000 de GSSI.  Ses principales caractéristiques sont les suivantes : Stockage des
  •   Prospections géophysiques    Hoedic, 2018    Entrée et sortie :       Antenne  Énergie : courant continu  Etheret I/O  Port E/S série (RS232)   Clé USB Compact Flash Maître esclave USB  En  combinaison  avec  cet  équipement,  une  antenne  monostatique  dʹune  fréquence  centrale
  •  dans les levés géoradar    Cette antenne 400 MHz et lʹunité centrale SIR‐3000 ont été couplées sur un chariot avec un  odomètre pour lʹacquisition de données géoradar (figures 13 et 14).     Pour  travailler  avec  le  géoradar,  une  maille  de  profils  orthogonaux  0,50  x  0,5
  •   dimensions  des  structures  enterrées à lʹétude.     21    Prospections géophysiques    Hoedic, 2018  Figure  13  ‐  Antenne  400  MHz  et  unité  centrale  SIR‐3000  couplées  sur  un  chariot  avec  odomètre  pour  lʹacquisition de données géoradar.    Figure  14.  Les
  • ). Les données ont été traitées à  lʹaide du programme RADAN (Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., GSSI).     Les  phases  suivantes  ont  été  suivies  pour  le  traitement  des  données  de  terrain  (radargrammes) :    A. Le traitement 1D et la correction du temps zéro (ajustement du
  •   dʹanomalies.  Elles  découlent  pour  la  plupart  de  la  présence  dans  le  sous‐sol  de  matériaux  modernes,  en  particulier  dʹobjets  métalliques  (boîtes  de  conserve,  clous,  vents  de  tentes...).  Ceci est particulièrement visible dans la partie centrale de lʹimage générée
RAP03055.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Ménez Drégan 1 : des prénéandertaliens aux néandertaliens à l'extrême ouest de l'Europe. rapport final de fp 2012-2014)
  • visualiser le platier rocheux et la morphologie de la plate-forme. A l’emplacement de l’entrée originelle de la grotte, par devant le site, un pilier central effondré, a probablement existé. Il s'agit d'un socle proéminent lui-même sectionné en trois parties par des rigoles d'érosion
  • rejet vertical a été observé (Monnier et al.,1998). Ce pilier central pouvait soutenir la voûte à l'entrée de la grotte, à un endroit où la portée, compte tenu de la fragilité de la roche, était importante. Celui-ci, déstabilisé à l'occasion d'une activité sismique, a pu s'effondrer
  • grotte beaucoup plus volumineuse que leurs successeurs, avec en outre un pilier central générant une double entrée. La restitution de ce porche double telle que nous la proposons (fig. 16) est par ailleurs tout à fait en adéquation avec ce que nous connaissons de certaines grottes
  • marines actives, par exemple sur la péninsule de Crozon (falaises de Morgat) ou encore avec la morphologie et les dimensions de plusieurs grottes du Cap Sizun (Monnier, 1998, p. 59). Figure 16 : Profil selon XX’ mettant en évidence la base d’un probable pilier central qui divisait le
RAP03423_4.pdf (RENNES (35). Place Saint-Germain : naissance et évolution d'un quartier de Rennes de l'Antiquité tardive à 1944. Rapport de fouille )
  • complémentaires 1433 tarsométatarse tandis qu’il est absent chez les femelles (West 1982, Carey 1982). Les os ont été mesurés suivant les recommandations d’A. von den Driesch (1976), complétées par celles de V. Einsenmann (1980, 1981, 1986) pour les Équidés et de C. Mourer-Chauviré (1975
RAP02397.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Menez-Dregan I. rapport final de fp 2006-2008)
  • de Penmarch (étude de programmation réalisée) où la présentation de Menez-Dregan devrait être un élément important et central. 14 LE CONTEXTE GEOLOGIQUE ET LA FORMATION DE LA GROTTE Le substrat de la partie orientale du littoral de Plouhinec correspond à l'orthogneiss oeillé
  • surtout le dégagement des blocs effondrés ont permis de visualiser le platier rocheux et la morphologie de la plate-forme. A l'emplacement de l'entrée originelle de la grotte, par devant le site, un pilier central effondré, a probablement existé. Il s'agit d'un socle proéminent lui
  • d'orientation nord-ouest/sud-est, pour laquelle un net rejet vertical a été observé (Monnier et al.,1998). Ce pilier central pouvait soutenir la voûte à l'entrée de la grotte, à un endroit où la portée, compte tenu de la fragilité de la roche, était importante. Celui-ci, déstabilisé à
  • tout premiers occupants de la cavité aient connu une grotte beaucoup plus volumineuse que leurs successeurs, avec en outre un pilier central générant une double entrée. La restitution de ce porche double telle que nous la proposons (figure ci-dessous) est par ailleurs tout à fait en
  • la base d'un probable pilier central qui divisait le porche de la grotte en deux entrées latérales (© S. Hinguant). 20 Jiàl, 2b 2c 3a 3b 4a 4b 4c 5a à 5e 5e-d M- 6 t, a $ í
RAP00129.pdf (PLOULEC'H (22). le Yaudet. rapport de sondage et de prospection-inventaire.)
  • aujourd'hui occupé par la route donnant accès au site. Le promontoire est occupé par le noyau central du village du Yaudet et par les vestiges des terres agricoles qui en dépendaient. Ces exploitations sont aujourd'hui abandonnées, mais on distingue encore fort bien les murets qui
  • Galliou Institute of Archaeology., University of Oxford and Centre de Recherche Breton et Celtique, University of Brest The e x c a v a t i o n o f 1991 The s i t e o f Le Yaudet i n t h e Commune o f P l o u l e c ' h (C d'A) occupies a promontory j u t t i n g o u t i n t o t
  • south-west, east. outcrop, Les Rochers de t o t h e c l i f f edge a t the n o r t h ­ The e n t r a n c e p r o b a b l y passed around t h e n o r t h - e a s t end o f t h e rampart, a p o s i t i o n taken now by t h e modern road. The headland i s occupied by t h e core o
  • evidence b u t an e a r l y medieval date seems l i k e l y (Savidan 1935; Mazeres 1936). From 1952 u n t i l 1954 P r o f e s s o r F l e u r i o t examined t h e Roman w a l l a t t h e n o r t h - e a s t corner o f t h e s i t e b o t h west and s o u t h o f t h e Poste de Douane
  • . To t h e west he uncovered a Roman gate which gave access t o a convenient of t h e c l i f f s . The e x c a v a t i o n has n o t been p u b l i s h e d b u t i n t e r i m accounts were prepared 1954, 1955). landing place a t the f o o t ( F l e u r i o t 1952, 1953, 1954a
  • the archaeological i n v e s t i g a t i o n s and casual d i s c o v e r i e s and from t h e h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d (De La B o r d e r i e 1853, 1896; Fleuriot considerable h i s t o r i c a l 1954b) t h a t Le Yaudet i s a site of potential: the promontory has produced
  • be determined? W i t h these o b j e c t i v e s i n mind a j o i n t F r a n c o - B r i t i s h e x c a v a t i o n was mounted o r g a n i z e d by Le Centre de Recherche Bretonne e t C e l t i q u e , U n i v e r s i t y o f B r e s t and t h e I n s t i t u t e o f Archaeology, U n
  • e rampart, t h e o t h e r (Trench 2) immediately adjacent m a r i t i m e gate. t o Fleuriot's excavation o f t h e Roman The aim o f Trench 1 was t o t e s t t h e s t r a t i g r a p h i e sequence i n an area where t h e s u r v i v a l o f a r c h a e o l o g i c a l
  • , exceeded our e x p e c t a t i o n s . Trench 1 Trench 1 , a c u t t i n g 23 m l o n g and 2 m wide, was dug i n an abandoned f i e l d ( p a r c e l l e 20), which l a y behind, t h a t i s t o t h e west, o f t h e rampart. A t t h e n o r t h end o f t h e t r e n c h s u b s o
  • and w e l l p r e s e r v e d s t r a t i g r a p h y examined d i v i d e s into s i x major phases o f a c t i v i t y which i t i s c o n v e n i e n t t o d e s c r i b e i n sequences. Phase 1. The e a r l i e s t o c c u p a t i o n i s r e p r e s e n t e d by two p o s t
RAP01858.pdf (les sites mésolithiques en Bretagne. rapport de 1re année de projet collectif de recherche)