Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Auteur
Type d'opération
Commune
Département
Date (Année)

484 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1987 PU EAST BRITTANY SURVEY - OUST/VILAINE WATERSHED EASTER 1987 The seventh season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul ti -di sci pl i nary study of the relationship between 1 and-use and settlement during the last two thousand
  • (from the area of La Sourigaie to La Houssaie), passing through the communes of Missiriac and Malestroit and the northern outskirts of the town of Malestroit; Transect R ran north east for 7.75km from Trelo to Le Mur at the north-east corner of Carentoir, passing through the communes
  • of Comblessac, Guer and Les Brûlais; Transect M ran due east to the River Vilaine for 21.5km front the area of Bat Colin and Le Boschet in south-east Carentoir, passing through the communes of La Chapelle 1 Baceline, Sixt, Bruc , Pipriac and Guipry, and just south of the bourg of Pipriac
  • the 'blanks' lay on the steep si opes around La Hennelaye and Le Haut Couëdic. In R the 'blanks' lay near the Carentoi r /Combl essac commune boundary and on the steep si opes to the north east of this area; also north of Comblessac bourg , in and around the Lande de Craon. There were also
  • two groups of 'blank' fields south east and south west of Comblessac. Together thèse zones suggest that the settlement of Comblessac and its immediately dépendent arable may have been rather small, much smaller than the centres in the core communes: it is notable that a tile
  • of Bruc — for a distance of some 2.5km; thèse 'blank' fields begin already in the eastern part of Sixt commune though do not reach as far as the présent boundary of Pipriac on the east. Everything, including the shape of the fields, suggests that this is an area of late exploitation
  • . Thereafter, although there are a few 'blank' fields in the nei ghbourhood of Pipriac it is again marked that there are very few from Pipriac east to the Vilaine. The contrast between this area and that to the west of it is very striking. The distribution of material in relation
  • . In P concentrations tended to lie on south-, south-eastor south-west—f aci ng slopes (48.17.) or on those facing west. (11.17.) - south-west especially; i n M they tended to lie on north-, north-east-or north-west-f aci ng slopes (36.97.) or, southand sDuth-west-f aci ng slopes
  • (23.8%) - north-east especially; in R on east-, north-eastor south-east-f aci ng slopes (37.77.) - east especially. In P 37% lay on -Fiat land, in M 19.47. and in R 22.6%. Ail this is unremarkable in the light of the prevailing local topography. Présence of the imported schi stes
  • on the north-east side of the high land near the Carentoi r /Combl essac boundary and none by the wood in the Lande de Craon, both areas lacking surface pottery too. There was little or no pink material on the western and south-western si des of this high land, and none from Couè'dillan
  • north east to Comblessac, as also north from Comblessac to the Lande de Craon. The pattern of occurrences of the schi stes in thèse transects suggests that the pink schi stes . i.e. material from the Guer quarries, may wel 1 have been the earliest to be used in the roofing industry
  • and the western section of M). Some of the Roman fabrics in eastern ti had not been noted before, and included a late Roman roi 1 er-st amped sherd of Argonne ware from M447, near 'Château Gaillard', 2.5km east of Pipriac bourg ■ This ware has an essentially coastal distribution, although
  • provided financial support. G. G. Astill Department of Archaeology University of Reading Whi tekni ghts Reading RG6 2AA Wendy Davies Department of History University Collège London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT 9 July 1987 REFERENCES Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1982 'Un nouveau programme
RAP03967 (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil à Quiberon. Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de fouille programmée 2020 )
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EAST BRITTANY SURVEY SEPTEMBER Introduction B409 (Carentoir ZA161) Fig. A92 1, 2 (Ruffiac ZK67) Fig. A3 1/79 3 (Ruffiac ZN119) Fig. 4 Fig. 5 H 132 (Ruffiac ZL40) Fig. 674 6 (Carentoir YB29) Fig. 7 L26 (Ruffiac YA224) Fi g . 8 D153
  • (Carentoir YK5) Fig. 9 Fig. 10 General Comment Acknowl edgements Références SEASQN 1988 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY - OUST/ VILAINE WATERSHED SEPTEMBER 1988 The eighth and 1 ast season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul ti -di sci pl i nary study
  • ) was si ted in the north-east part of the field where there was a coïncidence of pre— medi eval and médiéval pottery. A test pi t (T37) was also dug in the south west , over a squar e wh i c h had produced n o t. a b 1 e qu ant i t i e s of pre- medi eval pottery and brick and tile
  • some pièces were 5mm across. This layer varied in thickness -from 0.75m on the eastern, up-slope, side o-f the trench to 0.38m on the west. At the east end the top sur-face o-f 2 curved as i -f the layer had been mounded up. This layer could not be total ly excavated over the whole
  • fragments. Mear the east section was an oval pit (25: lm x 0.75m and 0.28m deep); the fill again produced no finds (27). Another pit in section (26: fill 28, no finds) had been eut into by a smal 1er pit (7: fill 8). Three intercutting pits were excavated in the centre of the trench
  • 2 and to the présent ground surface, that is it occurred at a higher level in the west end of T36 and sloped down to the east. It was on this surface that a spindle whorl of soft brown-yellow mudstone was found. Trench 37 The plough soil (13) was removed in three 0.1m spits
  • large Roman settlement which lies 100m to the south east (see fig. 2). In sura , then , this 6m square produced évidence of an early agricultural phase, followed by two phases of Iron-Age activity, and then a later - perhaps mue h later - agricultural phase. Although there is a large
  • was not présent in such quanti ti es. Although the area excavated was so small, it is sufficient to reveal that this zone is of exceptional importance as a long-used settlement area - Iron Age, Roman nearby to the south east, two seigneurial sites hardby (Le Bois Guillaume and La Touche au
  • and irnplied that p>lough damage was greater than anticipated. 4m of the 6m length of the exposed ditch was excavated: it was steep sided with a fiai, bottom (0.8m deep and 1.3m wide). The ditch sloped down towards the east. It was filied with a silty soil with rounded quartz pebbles
  • the same corner and was 4.5m long; T44 was eut north from the north-east corner of T28 for 4.4m (fig. 3). In T42 two ditches were located eut into the natural . One (24) was lm wide and about 0.2m deep and was fi lied with a loam (23) similar to the plough soil. The other (39) was much
  • and was destroyed or collap>sed in the second century, with no subséquent occupation of that parti cul ar site. A31/79 (Ru-ffiac ZN 119) A3 1/79 is situated 4 00m north of Petit Madou in Ruffiac; it stretches from the crest of a ridge on the 40m contour down the north-east slope of a small
  • ) by machine in order to understand a feature. The archaeological préservation was of varying quality; features were only located if they penetrated the natural subsoil. On the ridge and top of the slope the features had clearly been truncated by ploughing so that few were deeper than 0.1
  • soil varied from 0.15m on the top of the ridge (the south-west end of T40) to 0.4m at the north-east, down-slope, end. The plough soil (57, 78) overlay the natural clay subsoil (79), into which features had been eut. The shallowness of the plough soil and regular ploughing probably
  • to run east-west and it had been reçut, for' ditch 3 had removed the north side. The reçut ditch had a similar profile, was 0.6m wide and 0.4m deep. It contained an A31/79 Roman poMery f f Brick and tile o o o o OOOO O o 00 o o O o o 00 00 TV o o o 000 00 000 00 00 o o
  • 0.3kg per square) of brick and tile. The field is lowlyinq and located 100m east of the Château de la Ruée, to the? east of Ruffiac (fi g. 6). The a n c ien çadas t. r e records this field as permanent meadow in the early nineteenth century but it also shows that it forméd part
  • the cluster of squares with much médiéval pottery and the stone scatter. When it became clear that structural évidence survived, the area was extended as far as the eut maize would allow to the south and south west (T38) . A test pit (T31) was also dug 15m east of the château in a field
  • : diameter lm, filled with 37) and a ditch, perhaps a drain, which ran diagonally across T32 (32: 0.8m wide, filled with 34); at its north-west end i t. was shallow and f 1 at-bottomed , but at the south east it had become deeper and had a 'V' shaped profile (fig. 6). Fi ve other post
  • , 28), and the upper courses of the main wall were also removed leaving some remains of the rubble core (6, 13). The whole area south of wall 7/51 was then spread with debr i s-packed layers - 11/25 in the west and 5 in the east; context 5 had a high proportion of roofing material
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1986 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EAST BRITTANY SURVEY EASTER AND SEPTEMBER SEASONS 1986 Easter Season 2 Fi el dwal ki ng at 50m intervais 2 Fi g . A 3 Sampling outside the core 6 7 Fig. B Excavations Al 16 8 Fi g. C 10 September Season Fi g
  • intervais, using collection units of 100m; field EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1986 | TRANSECT J TRANSECT B "t— TRANSECT D TRANSECT A TRANSECT E -h— .y. : 75 m ■ ci3 " S Y •m .o-v. Tréal Lo 50ml—' O O .... □ ; C? (Rutfiac g SO TRANSECT G l'ï «2. cm. fl\ □ 1-5km apart
  • intensive covera\ge achieved by rewalking many of the transects did not affect distribution patterns already noted» By contrast , concentrations of surface material are ^frequently found in zones around Le Cleu, La Touche (east of Treal) and - especially - in the southern half
  • .Land whiie 14/. were on south-f aci ng and 19.37. on east-facing slopes. Upland concentrât i on s were not especially notable, with only a quarter lying between the 50m and 75m contours (28. IX) 5 almost a half 1 ay between 25m and 50m (49.17.). Somewhat less than a half
  • and their property less dispersed, with more cattle and altogether a more wealthy air; and, despite récent in the core. remembrement , fewer remembrement mounds than Transect M, running slightly south 01 east from the south~-e?ast corner of Carentoir, was bequn, but most of it remains 209 fields
  • from the north-west corner of T4 and eut the edge of the earthwork platform at right angles; the other (T6) was 23m long and ran from the south-east corner of T4 to the southern end of the platform. A section of the whole earthwork was thus obt ai ned . The earliest évidence came
  • of the settlement of Quoiqueneuc in Treal , in the area of a smal 1 n i nth-cent ury monastery. The field is bounded to the north by the main east-west road leading to Quoiqueneuc, and to the west by the road to Le Passai r. The ancien cadastre shows H145 to have been within an area of largely
  • sel f . K446 (Ruffiac ZA106) Ruf f i ac K446 is si tuât ed on the eastern outskirts of Becul eu 1 n
  • (from east to west s T23 , T24 , Iron Age pottery could be T25) , suc h that the areas producing of the trenches were cleaned by hand and tested. The si des part of the plough soil was excavated by recorded; the lowest features located thereby. The trenches were hand, as were
  • was a ragged v-shaped ditch, 1.3m wide and 40cm deep (46), which followed the slope down the valley side -for at 1 east 90m; subsidiary machine eut s (T26, T27) located the ditch on the saine alignment and f ai 1 ed to produce évidence of a tujrn. Both ditches contai ned small quanti ti es
  • schi ste. Dver the bottom had been laid a layer of compactée! schi ste in which there was at 1 east one rut. (64). On this surface accumulated a layer of silt (63), which was in turn covered by soil which had been tipped in from the south edge of the holloway (61, 62). A new surface
  • east of La Hattaie (fig. 4). The field is in a low-lying position and si opes very slightly down to the north. The ancien cadastre shows that H80 was an area of mixed land-use, parti y cultivated in strips but also with 1 an des (uncul ti vated ) and pasture, in small enclosures
  • the first trench was placed over one of the 'concentrations' of Iron Age pottery. Initial ly ai 6m square (T15) was excavated as at Al 16, A92 and H145, and then five trenches (1 mètre wide) were eut north-south across the field at 30m intervais using a machine (from west to east. T16/17
  • activities taking place within small enclosures beyond the residential area» One possible interprétation of H80, then, is that it was the site of a late prehistoric settlement, the focus of which lay in the west of HSO and beyond it, with associated enclosures to the east » A92
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY: QUST-VILAINE UATERSHED REPORT ON FIELDWORK IN MARCH-APRIL 1985 The fourth season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, multi-discipl inary study of the rel ati onshi p between land-use and seulement during the last two thousand years, took
  • . The remaining concentrations (25.7%) had a prédominance of building material, at présent treated as undatable. 2 As usual , the topographical position of the sites was analysed. About a third of them (29.4%) were on flat 1 and while 17.1% were on south-facing and 16.6% on south-east-f
  • in the Coet Morel /Hôtel Orl and area (Carentoir). Surface material is markedly absent from fields on the northern and southern boundaries of L, on the east/west ridges (particularly on a band north west of Carentoir) and - as might be expected - on most steep slopes. There are again
  • . The results confirm the impression that this 1 and was not brought into cultivation until the twentieth century, and confirm the classification made on the basis of transect walking - the field real ly is 1 bl ank 1 . B347 lies on a slight east-facing slope at 35m, beside a stream, and its
  • usters of other classes of material. 5 Excavations (EBS85 Tl and T2) Small -scale excavation of earthworks was undertaken in order to begin investigation of the soils and archaeology within field boundaries near sites identified in fieldwalking. As indicated previously, one
  • Bretagne, ii, 27-34. Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1982a 'Un recherche sur le terrain dans l'Est de Bretagne, xxxv, 24-42. nouveau programme de la Bretagne', Arch. en Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1982b 'Fieldwalking in East Brittany, 1982', Cambridge Médiéval Celtic Studies, iv, 19-31
  • , Sussex Bell, M. 1983 'Valley sédiments as évidence of prehistoric land-use on the South Downs', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, xlix, 119-150. 1+ EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1985 £J3 fields walked m 1965 ■— — commune boundaries A • ■ sites A c* U probable • médiéval si tes
RAP00564.pdf ((56). l'arrondissement de Vannes. rapport de prospection inventaire)
  • 251 PROSPECTIONS ARCHEOLOGIQUES DANS L'EST DE LA BRETAGNE: LE BASSIN DE L'OUST ET DE LA VILAINE par Grenville ASTILL* et Wendy DAVIES** * Department of Archaeology .University of Reading. ** Department of History .University Collège, London Le programme de prospections en
  • de l'habitat et les pratiques agraires lors d'une période antérieure aux vastes changements entraînés par le développement des techniques agricoles modernes. .' 252 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1983 0 THANSECT C TRANSECT ▲ • + ■ sitw A» ^ □ probable 5km F TRANSECT Q *^ \ sitt
  • et repéré 79 "sites possibles", 50 "sites probables" et 32 "sites (Cf Figure 2). Environ L% des céramiques recueillies datent de l'époque romaine, 67% du 256 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1983 Figure 3 257 Moyen-Age et 29% des siècles postérieurs; il y a certes quelques silex dans le
  • millénaires. (Traduction : Patrick GALLIOU, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest) Notes. Cl) On consultera également : G.G. ASTILL,W.DAVlES,"Fieldwalking in East Brittany, 1982", Cambridge Médiéval Celtic Studies, IV , 1982, 19-31 ;id. , "Un nouveau programme de recherche sur le
  • mensuel de la Société Polymathique du Morbihan, n°1467 ,CX, 1983. EAST BRITTANY SURVEY A116 D142 B319 MEDIEVAL POT TER Y MEDIEVAL POTTERY MEDIEVAL D153 PHOSPHATE POTTERY MEDIEVAL POTTERY è en co PHOSPHATE KEY pottery:• • • • • phosphate > • 100-350 • 400-650 • 700-950 ppm
RAP03864 (PORT-LOUIS (56). Citadelle-bastion Desmouriers. Rapport de diagnostic)
RAP02611.pdf (LILLEMER (35). une enceinte du néolithique moyen. rapport de fp et pt)
RAP00563.pdf ((56). l'arrondissement de Vannes. rapport de prospection inventaire)
  • direction et 33 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1982 i i / i \ Carte A : Localisation de la zone étudiée. ■—■ —- major geological boundories transect A transect B 5 km 34 le code des -unités de ramassage et le nom des prospecteurs. Ces fiches étaient remplies sur le terrain. Un examen
  • le cadastre du dixneuvième siècle indique un groupe de maisons inhabitées mais où l'on ne voit plus rien aujourd'hui, nous avons découvert une proportion de céramiques paraissant fort élevée si on la compare à celle des briques et des 36 EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1982 tOOm «T
  • communes concernées ainsi que l'indulgence et l'intérêt dont ont fait preuve les agriculteurs. Les Universités de Reading et de York, VUniversity Collège (de l'Université de Londres, le Colt Fund de la Society for Médiéval Archaeology et un donateur anonyme, ayant versé une contribution
  • leur devons énormément, ainsi qu' à tous les autres. Grenville ASTILL Department of Archaeology University of Reading Whiteknights Park READING RG6 2AA Wendy DAVIES Department of History University Collège Gower Street LONDON WC1E 6 BT NOTES 1/ Cf. Archéologie en Bretagne, les
RAP02272.pdf (Vents et fours. du minerai à l'objet. recherches sur la ventilation naturelle en paléométallurgie du fer. rapport final de pcr 2005-2007)
RAP03817 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de l'Holocène. Rapport de FP 2019)
RAP00129.pdf (PLOULEC'H (22). le Yaudet. rapport de sondage et de prospection-inventaire.)
  • Galliou Institute of Archaeology., University of Oxford and Centre de Recherche Breton et Celtique, University of Brest The e x c a v a t i o n o f 1991 The s i t e o f Le Yaudet i n t h e Commune o f P l o u l e c ' h (C d'A) occupies a promontory j u t t i n g o u t i n t o t
  • south-west, east. outcrop, Les Rochers de t o t h e c l i f f edge a t the n o r t h ­ The e n t r a n c e p r o b a b l y passed around t h e n o r t h - e a s t end o f t h e rampart, a p o s i t i o n taken now by t h e modern road. The headland i s occupied by t h e core o
  • the archaeological i n v e s t i g a t i o n s and casual d i s c o v e r i e s and from t h e h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d (De La B o r d e r i e 1853, 1896; Fleuriot considerable h i s t o r i c a l 1954b) t h a t Le Yaudet i s a site of potential: the promontory has produced
  • be determined? W i t h these o b j e c t i v e s i n mind a j o i n t F r a n c o - B r i t i s h e x c a v a t i o n was mounted o r g a n i z e d by Le Centre de Recherche Bretonne e t C e l t i q u e , U n i v e r s i t y o f B r e s t and t h e I n s t i t u t e o f Archaeology, U n
RAP01768.pdf (le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
RAP03187.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP 2015)
RAP03926 (SAINT-BRANDAN (22). La Porte au Souda : nouvelles données sur l'agglomération antique du Rillan. Rapport de fouille)