Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Auteur
Type d'opération
Commune
Département
Date (Année)

2211 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • for walking. The season was therefore especially productive. Fieldwalking in Runs at 50m intervais (Transect Walking) Fieldwalking over large areas was organised within transects running south/north across the communes. L (in Ruffiac), the only transect not yet walked, was completed
  • , concentrations of surface material were most frequently found in the basin to the south of Ruffiac village (the centre of L) and in the nei ghbourhood of Trignac, in the north of Carentoir commune (F); however, sites were common throughout the southern halves of F and C, particularly
  • of brick and tile (50.82g). The assemblage included second-century Roman wares, fifteen fragments of tegul a and one of imbrex. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery were gênerai 1 y distributed over the field but both Roman pottery and brick and tile cl ustered in the north-eastern third
  • , and rather more variation than did the other fields, with some tendency for lower readings in the area of the brick/tile/Roman cl ustering. A pl atf orm at the north-western edge of the field produced little material of any type; it is likely that this area has been ploughed down
  • , at least during the médiéval period (Astill and Davies 1984a: 20). A116 lies to the north of Ruffiac, between Coetion and Le Vivier. It is located in a small damp valley bottom, on a north-facing si ope, at 70m. At least one platform can be seen. To the north of the field, in the lowest
  • of the 18 mètre squares) was dug. Soil samples for micromorphol ogical and pollen analysis were taken in columns from the sections, using purpose-made meta! containers. Small test holes were also eut by machine at every 15m to the north of Trench 1 (up the side of the south-facing valley
  • ploughing of the field to the north, at least during the médiéval period (see fig. 3). The trial holes up the slope to the north of Trench 1 showed that the subsoil occurred at a shallow depth (about 30cm), in contrast to that recorded at the north end of Trench 1 (lm), and at the crest
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY: QUST-VILAINE UATERSHED REPORT ON FIELDWORK IN MARCH-APRIL 1985 The fourth season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, multi-discipl inary study of the rel ati onshi p between land-use and seulement during the last two thousand years, took
  • place between 21 March and 13 April in the communes of Ruffiac, Tréal , St-Nicol as-du-Tertre and Carentoir in the Morbihan in eastern Brittany. The aim of the study is to détermine when, how and why the exploitation of the environment changed direction within the historic period
  • and two adjacent transects in Carentoir (F and C), which had been inadequately covered in 1983 because of the height of the crop, were rewalked; F included the cadastral and modem village of Carentoir (see fig. 1). Except for a small area in the north of C, and for fields previously
  • . The remaining concentrations (25.7%) had a prédominance of building material, at présent treated as undatable. 2 As usual , the topographical position of the sites was analysed. About a third of them (29.4%) were on flat 1 and while 17.1% were on south-facing and 16.6% on south-east-f
  • in the Coet Morel /Hôtel Orl and area (Carentoir). Surface material is markedly absent from fields on the northern and southern boundaries of L, on the east/west ridges (particularly on a band north west of Carentoir) and - as might be expected - on most steep slopes. There are again
  • /grey and red/yellow) and three sizes (1.5cm) in an attempt to find criteria for distinguishing between local and imported material. A107 lies just below a flat, exposed hilltop on a south-facing slope 75-80m high. The area was arable when the cadastral survey
  • was recorded, the field being the same size and shape as at présent but divided into bandes; an area of 1 ande lay to the north and the nearest settlement (La Boulardaie) lay 130m away. Pottery, building material and schi ste were collected from an area of 1 hectare, distributed ail over
  • ity readings did not vary much, but although médiéval and post-medieval pottery were gênerai ly distributed over the field, both Roman wares and brick and tile cl ustered in the north-west quarter. Although quantities of Roman pottery were small, those of brick and tile were
  • unusually large, and their distribution, together with the nature of the assemblage, suggests that the field once contained a Roman-period structure. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery, by contrast, probably arrived as a resuit of manuring. B216 lies on a slight north-west si ope at 65m
  • part of the valley, is an area of permanent pasture in which there is a prominent bank and a possible platform (see fig. 2). The bank runs diagonally across the valley bottom. 130m to the west of this bank, at the bottom of the south-facing slope of the valley, is a pronounced
  • useful information. After three days préparation, excavation took place over eight days with a team of nine people, making a total of 52 working days. The weather during this period was appalling, with torrential rain and high winds: one complète day was lost and extremely difficult
  • conditions prevailed on another three. Excavation therefore had to be more limited than was intended. The excavation strategy was similar to that used by Martin Bell to sample lynchets and valley bottoms in the south of England (Bell 1977; 1983). A 2m-wide trench, 14m long, was eut across
  • ) in order to record the depth of the subsoil (see fig. 2). Trench 1. A shallow ditch was located, eut into the subsoil and natural schi ste. It had a slightly sloping bottom (33cm wide) and was situated 5m north of the crest of the présent lynchet; the ditch was on approximatel y
RAP03967 (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil à Quiberon. Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de fouille programmée 2020 )
  • Décembre 2020 N° de site : 56 186 0007 Arrêté : 2020-083 du 13 mars 2020 Responsable (Paléo-environnement) : Catherine Dupont Coresponsable (Archéologie) : Grégor Marchand Contributions de : Nancy Marcoux (Université de Rennes 1) Marylise Onfray (UMR 8215 Trajectoires) Marie-France
  • (Télégramme) et Madame Caroline Moreau (Ouest-France et Musée de Quiberon) pour leur suivi médiatique toujours très pertinent, ainsi que pour l’accueil chaleureux de cette dernière auprès des médias. • Madame Catherine Gorlini, Madame Catherine Louazel et Madame Annie Delahaie (laboratoire
  • étroit font de Beg-er-Vil une référence exceptionnelle pour le second Mésolithique en Europe atlantique. L’habitat de Beg-er-Vil est encore bien seul dans l’Ouest de la France pour cet intervalle chronologique de la fin du 7ème millénaire avant notre ère. Par les caractères généraux
  • Guillaume Guérin Nancy Marcoux Marie-France DietschSellami UMR 6566 CReAAH – Ministère de la Culture – CNRS Université de Rennes 1 UMR 6566 CReAAH – CNRS UMR 6566 CReAAH – Université de Rennes 1 IIPC Santander - Espagne Oxford University Ecobio - Université de Rennes 1 IRAMAT
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • of the relationship between land-use and settlement during the 1 ast two thousand years, took place from 25 August - 1 October in the communes of Ruffiac, Tréal , St-Ni col as-du-Tertre and Carentoir, in the department of Morbihan in eastern Brittany. The ai m of the study is to détermine when
  • ) was si ted in the north-east part of the field where there was a coïncidence of pre— medi eval and médiéval pottery. A test pi t (T37) was also dug in the south west , over a squar e wh i c h had produced n o t. a b 1 e qu ant i t i e s of pre- medi eval pottery and brick and tile
  • ) . At a later stage two further trenches were eut mechanically 30m either side of T39 (T40 to the south, T41 to the north). The sides of the trenches were cleaned by hand and recorded; the lowest part of the plough soil and features were excavated by hand. In one case T39 was extended (T46
  • soil varied from 0.15m on the top of the ridge (the south-west end of T40) to 0.4m at the north-east, down-slope, end. The plough soil (57, 78) overlay the natural clay subsoil (79), into which features had been eut. The shallowness of the plough soil and regular ploughing probably
  • : diameter lm, filled with 37) and a ditch, perhaps a drain, which ran diagonally across T32 (32: 0.8m wide, filled with 34); at its north-west end i t. was shallow and f 1 at-bottomed , but at the south east it had become deeper and had a 'V' shaped profile (fig. 6). Fi ve other post
  • ). There is subsequently clear évidence for the western extension of the building. A shallow cut (22 and 26) was made north of the main wall, which may have been to allow the original and extension walls to be bonded. The main wall was extended west , a trench being packed with shale as a bedding (52
  • thick (4, 10, 23). A dump (12), largely of roofing material, was laid over some of this in the north-western corner of T38. Above thèse layers was the modem plough soil (3, 8), but some of the large blocks of walling may have protruded to cause plough damage, and were subsequently
  • pottery (maximum 5 sherds per square) was more evenly spread. Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile (maximum 0 .5kg per square) were uhevenl y distributed, but tended to concentrate in the south of the field, away from the cl Lister i ng of pre—médiéval and médiéval pottery
  • some pièces were 5mm across. This layer varied in thickness -from 0.75m on the eastern, up-slope, side o-f the trench to 0.38m on the west. At the east end the top sur-face o-f 2 curved as i -f the layer had been mounded up. This layer could not be total ly excavated over the whole
  • at the base of context 2, eut into what looked like a buried soil (32). AI 1 had si mi 1 ar fills of yel 1 owi sh-brown sandy loam with charcoal flecks. On the north side of the trench part of a large pit was excavated (3: lm wide, 0.42m deep > . It had a lower fi II with sliqhtly more
  • charcoal (16) and smail 1 fragments of mudstone; this produced two smal 1 and abraded sherds of Iron-Age pottery (Fabric 86); the upper fill (15) had no finds. Another pit was also found in the north section (22: lm wide, 0.42m deep) whose fill (23) had no finds but more mudstone
  • large Roman settlement which lies 100m to the south east (see fig. 2). In sura , then , this 6m square produced évidence of an early agricultural phase, followed by two phases of Iron-Age activity, and then a later - perhaps mue h later - agricultural phase. Although there is a large
  • was not présent in such quanti ti es. Although the area excavated was so small, it is sufficient to reveal that this zone is of exceptional importance as a long-used settlement area - Iron Age, Roman nearby to the south east, two seigneurial sites hardby (Le Bois Guillaume and La Touche au
  • the proximity of the Roman buildings. The si des and bottom of the trenches were cleaned manually. Ihe extent of the trenches was limited by the track and modem drainage pipes. T42 was eut from the north-west corner of T28 due west for a 1 distance of 9m; T43 was eut due north from
  • the same corner and was 4.5m long; T44 was eut north from the north-east corner of T28 for 4.4m (fig. 3). In T42 two ditches were located eut into the natural . One (24) was lm wide and about 0.2m deep and was fi lied with a loam (23) similar to the plough soil. The other (39) was much
  • probabil ity the same one, at the north end of both trenches. The ditch (27 in T43, 35 in T44) was 0.7m wide and 0.3m deep and was fill ed with a silty clay which produced no finds (28 in T43, 33 and 34 in T44) . This ditch appear s to have been a drainage ditch for the track which
  • marks the north b oun d ar y of t h e field. None of the trenches produced structural évidence though the plough soil contai ned large blocks of stone which were cl early derived from a building. It is qui te possible that the buildings were located right. on the ridge, and therefore
  • underneath the présent track. Trench 29 The plough soil s (3 and 4) were removed to the level that was reached at the end of the? 1986 season. A modem pit (7 and 8) was rel ocated aïs was ai ditch (5) in the north of the trench. A shallow and i rr egular modem trench was also found (18
  • to that of 10. The finds, though more plentiful, were similar in range: 14 sherds of grey coarse ware jars, 4 sherds of ter ra-ni qra -type pottery, 6 sherds of Iron-Age fabric and two pièces of ceramic tile were found. There was another ditch (11) in the south of the trench, eut
  • that this ditch was filled (and perhaps eut) at a later date than ditches 5 and 10. Indeed it may have been filled during the 9 destruction o-f the buildings. Comment The fabric and forms of the pottery, similar to the material from HSO (excavated in 1986: Asti 11 and Davies 1987, 120-1
RAP01768.pdf (le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
  • site mésolithique de Beg-er-Vil (Morbihan, France) 86 VI EXPLOITATION DE LA FAUNE 104 French Connections II: Of cows and men 104 VII. FLORAISON DE SITES PREHISTORIQUES DANS LA MOYENNE VALLEE DU BLAVET : 115 1. Généralités 115 2. Matériaux, toujours / 115 3. De l'Azilien
  • , tracéologue, propose d'étendre son sujet de recherche à l'ouest de la France. Grégor Marchand introduit la séance d'exposés en mentionnant les grands axes des problématiques actuelles. Pour le Mésolithique ancien-moyen, l'isolement du groupe de Bertheaume reste à briser : ses liens avec le
  • accéder aux faunes de Hoëdic conservées à l'I.P.H. Anne Tresset conclut en soulignant la vigueur des économies de chasse au Néolithique moyen dans l'ouest de la France, de Chauvigny (Vienne) à Villeneuve-Tolosane. Catherine Dupont travaille sur la diète mésolithique et néolithique
  • , telle que l'on peut l'appréhender à partir des coquillages marins, sur la façade atlantique de la France. Les problèmes d'échantillonnage sont importants : l'analyse réclame autant la parure que les restes alimentaires et le tamisage à l'eau est nécessaire. Cette dernière technique
  • compte des sites dans la Carte archéologique. Ce programme de prospection thématique s'étendant sur trois ans s'inscrit dans le PCR « le Mésolithique en Bretagne » et dans un programme de l'U.M.R. 6566 du CNRS « L 'Epipaléolithique et le Mésolithique de l'ouest de la France». Ces
  • Le fort développement de l'archéologie préventive en France ces dernières années n'a pas particulièrement profité à l'archéologie préhistorique, et surtout pas à la période mésolithique. A l'inverse, les travaux de prospection au sol, souvent laissés aux amateurs, livrent un
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • material and not pink. Pink schi stes are found, however, in some discrète areas: close to south-eastern Carentoir, in western parts of the Bruc 'blank', in odd fields near Pipriac, around Patis de la Porte, Château La Frèche, La Glonnais, Malon and in small quantities around Les
  • on the north-east side of the high land near the Carentoi r /Combl essac boundary and none by the wood in the Lande de Craon, both areas lacking surface pottery too. There was little or no pink material on the western and south-western si des of this high land, and none from Couè'dillan
  • . In P concentrations tended to lie on south-, south-eastor south-west—f aci ng slopes (48.17.) or on those facing west. (11.17.) - south-west especially; i n M they tended to lie on north-, north-east-or north-west-f aci ng slopes (36.97.) or, southand sDuth-west-f aci ng slopes
  • (23.8%) - north-east especially; in R on east-, north-eastor south-east-f aci ng slopes (37.77.) - east especially. In P 37% lay on -Fiat land, in M 19.47. and in R 22.6%. Ail this is unremarkable in the light of the prevailing local topography. Présence of the imported schi stes
  • Emailleries. It seems highly likely that most of this transect, beyond its western parts, lay beyond the normal area of distribution of this material, whose source we have recently localized to quarries immediately south west of Guer. In Transect R there were no 'roofing' schi stes
  • and the western section of M). Some of the Roman fabrics in eastern ti had not been noted before, and included a late Roman roi 1 er-st amped sherd of Argonne ware from M447, near 'Château Gaillard', 2.5km east of Pipriac bourg ■ This ware has an essentially coastal distribution, although
  • EAST BRITTANY SURVEY 1987 PU EAST BRITTANY SURVEY - OUST/VILAINE WATERSHED EASTER 1987 The seventh season in a programme of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul ti -di sci pl i nary study of the relationship between 1 and-use and settlement during the last two thousand
  • years, took place from 20 March - 4 April in the communes surrounding Ruffiac, Treal , St-Ni col as-du-Tertre and Carentoir, in the departments of Morbihan and 1 1 1 e-et-Vi 1 ai ne in eastern Brittany. The aim of the study is to détermine when, how and why the exploitation
  • ) Sampling was organized in three 2km transects radiating from the core (P, M and R) and thèse were wal ked in the same way as Transects A to L within the core and Transect N outside it, in 1982-6. Transect P ran due west to the River Oust for 4.1km from the western boundary of Ruffiac
  • (from the area of La Sourigaie to La Houssaie), passing through the communes of Missiriac and Malestroit and the northern outskirts of the town of Malestroit; Transect R ran north east for 7.75km from Trelo to Le Mur at the north-east corner of Carentoir, passing through the communes
  • of Comblessac, Guer and Les Brûlais; Transect M ran due east to the River Vilaine for 21.5km front the area of Bat Colin and Le Boschet in south-east Carentoir, passing through the communes of La Chapelle 1 Baceline, Sixt, Bruc , Pipriac and Guipry, and just south of the bourg of Pipriac
  • . However, P, an area topographi cal 1 y characterized by the drop of land down to the River Oust, was not dissimilar to the eastern section of M, where the land dropped down to the River Vilaine; here, for a comparable distance, 6.77. of fields walked had notable concentrations
  • the 'blanks' lay on the steep si opes around La Hennelaye and Le Haut Couëdic. In R the 'blanks' lay near the Carentoi r /Combl essac commune boundary and on the steep si opes to the north east of this area; also north of Comblessac bourg , in and around the Lande de Craon. There were also
  • two groups of 'blank' fields south east and south west of Comblessac. Together thèse zones suggest that the settlement of Comblessac and its immediately dépendent arable may have been rather small, much smaller than the centres in the core communes: it is notable that a tile
  • of Bruc — for a distance of some 2.5km; thèse 'blank' fields begin already in the eastern part of Sixt commune though do not reach as far as the présent boundary of Pipriac on the east. Everything, including the shape of the fields, suggests that this is an area of late exploitation
  • north east to Comblessac, as also north from Comblessac to the Lande de Craon. The pattern of occurrences of the schi stes in thèse transects suggests that the pink schi stes . i.e. material from the Guer quarries, may wel 1 have been the earliest to be used in the roofing industry
  • examination o-F it. Preliminary examination of the pottery suggests that there are some distinctions between the fabrics collected between Pipriac and the Vilaine (Transect M, eastern portion) and those characteri sti c both of the core and of sample transects near it (N, P, R
  • there are finds from the Rance/ Vi 1 ai ne river Systems and one sherd from Pipriac is already known (Galliou 1977: 91-2). The médiéval fabrics from this eastern région seem to have less mica, fewer spi cul es and more grog. Some of the fields with Roman material are of particular interest
  • was found near Le Boschet, Château de la Boulaye, 'Château Gaillard' (ail in M) and near le Mur (R) . There are, however, two cases of such material being found near (apparently) non-seigneurial settlements 300m from Comblessac in R and 100m from La Rigaudiere, 1km south of Pipriac, in M
  • st i es of the former, was separated from the Ruf f i ac/Carentoir core by the great Bruc 'blank'. Work outside the main season. 19B6—B7 During the past year work has continuée) on other aspects of the project, both field and archivai. Mi cromorphol ogi cal analysis of soi 1
RAP03817 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de l'Holocène. Rapport de FP 2019)
  • débitages de matières minérales, mais aussi peut-être dans un concassage de matières dures animales. Suivent en nombre les galets utilisés en pièces intermédiaires très fortement percutées dans un axe longitudinal. Ce travail amène à s’interroger sur l’indigence des outils massifs dans
  • le Mésolithique de l’ouest de la France, alors que les ressources minérales adéquates sont particulièrement abondantes sur les estrans. Un premier bilan de l’outillage osseux est proposé par Benjamin Marquebielle. Les objets finis en os et en bois de cerf sont largement
  • Brindejonc (Garde du Littoral) pour son suivi du chantier. • Madame Laurence Forin (Télégramme) et Madame Caroline Moreau (Ouest-France et Musée de Quiberon) pour leur suivi médiatique toujours très pertinent. • Madame Catherine Le Gall, Madame Catherine Louazel et Madame Annie Delahaie
  • encore bien seul dans l’Ouest de la France pour cet intervalle chronologique de la fin du 7ème millénaire avant notre ère. Par les caractères généraux de son industrie lithique, il s’intègre pourtant sans peine dans l’ensemble du second Mésolithique armoricain, dont Téviec et Hoëdic
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • to be completed on the excavation site» Fieldwalking in Runs at 50m intervais (Transect Walking) A. Within the core Fieldwalking over large areas within the four core communes was organised within transects running south/north across them» Transects A (Ruffiac), D, E, 6 (Carentoir), B
  • possible to see zoning in the présence of thèse schi stes» hence, only black schi stes occurred throughout the ^Ruffiac basin (from Lodineu to Ville Robert and south to La Rivière) and also in a large zone in the north of Transects D and E (from Trelo to La Touche du Mur); in strong
  • , transects within the core. Ail available fields Transect for we>re covered; tl 11s ran 10km slightly west of N of from the north-west Ruffiac, and passed north , boundary communes of Carc , Reminiac and Augan the and into the through south oi Zampefrieac, running just to the w est
  • of Augan commune centre, Here there was a marked change in topography - as the and in modem land management — as we moved also in the bedroc north 5 it was with steeper rnuch higher hi 1 1 s and some north/south valleys; but farms (and often fiel ds and houses) were biqger
  • in the core, and more are on south- (32.7), north(18.47.) and west--facing (12.27.) slopes - again reflecting the h i g h er t op og r ap h y „ Excavations. Al 16 Excavation was designed to sample the medieva\l settlement. of Al 16, located by fieldwalking and classified as a "site
  • from the north-west corner of T4 and eut the edge of the earthwork platform at right angles; the other (T6) was 23m long and ran from the south-east corner of T4 to the southern end of the platform. A section of the whole earthwork was thus obt ai ned . The earliest évidence came
  • presurnabl y some kind of hardstanding or floor (9) « The northern extent of the standing was established by augering and was found to peter out some three mètres north of the wall. The eastern extent. of the wall was similarly established and found to end 1 » 2m from T12, with no sign
  • sel f . K446 (Ruffiac ZA106) Ruf f i ac K446 is si tuât ed on the eastern outskirts of Becul eu 1 n
  • the first trench was placed over one of the 'concentrations' of Iron Age pottery. Initial ly ai 6m square (T15) was excavated as at Al 16, A92 and H145, and then five trenches (1 mètre wide) were eut north-south across the field at 30m intervais using a machine (from west to east. T16/17
  • (277.), greywacke (147.) and quartz (107.). The stone may have been used when the pit was used for firing, piled on to the south si de, and then pushed back. No finds were recovered from this feature. Half a mètre to the north a pit containing burnt clay fragments was excavated (18
  • of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul t i -di sci pl i nary study of the relationship between land-u.se and settlement during the last two thousand years, took place from 21 March - 5 April and 6 -- 27 September in the communes of Ruffiac, Treal, St~Ni col as-du-Tertre , Carentoir, La
  • Chapelle Gaceline, Caro, Reminiac, Augan and Campélieac in the Morbihan in eastern E
  • thus covered, encompassi ng 372 hectares (1.947. of the surface area of the four communes). This brings the total surface area covered during five seasons to 18.54%, as mue h as can reasonably be e>:pected within the constraints of time and money. 12.49kg of pottery and 78. 42kg
  • and also zones that tend to produce more or less of a surface scatter» Surface material is usually markedly absent from areas near the commune boundaries and is also difficult to find in the fields to the north of Qui 1 vain and around Le? Bois Faux; si gni f i cant 1 y , the more
  • contrast black and pink/purple roofing fragments occurred together in zones immediately north of the Ruffiac basin and west of the Trelo zone. It was also possible, in some cases, to distinguish a range of other schi stes that were imported from nearby local sources, probably as walling
  • .Land whiie 14/. were on south-f aci ng and 19.37. on east-facing slopes. Upland concentrât i on s were not especially notable, with only a quarter lying between the 50m and 75m contours (28. IX) 5 almost a half 1 ay between 25m and 50m (49.17.). Somewhat less than a half
  • and their property less dispersed, with more cattle and altogether a more wealthy air; and, despite récent in the core. remembrement , fewer remembrement mounds than Transect M, running slightly south 01 east from the south~-e?ast corner of Carentoir, was bequn, but most of it remains 209 fields
  • Bonneraye/Le Printemps/Saint-Nicolas (Reminiac) area and in the area around ^the château of Touraille, stretching north from it over the? Campeneac commune boundary to La Tieulais; and there are a di sti net i ve number of 1 ow concentrations of post-medi eval material in the Les PI aci
  • eux to Ville Glâird area. There are large 'blank' zones from La Ravraie to Le Boulay and also north west of Augan, although such zones are not so character i st i c of the commune boundaries as they are in the core communes. Se h i stes in gênerai re-f lect the pinker colour
  • . The first (T7) ran north west from T3 across a slight break in si ope, and the other two (T5 and T6) were eut in order to section the platform near T4 (see fig. C) . The-? sections were cleaned and drawn and features in the bottom of the trenches recorded. The two 6m squares were mai ni
Les premier peuplements de l’ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne (2018) (Les premier peuplements de l’ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne. Rapport de PCR 2018)
  • Les premier peuplements de l’ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne. Rapport de PCR 2018
  • DIRECTION RÉGIONALE DES AFFAIRES CULTURELLES DE BRETAGNE SERVICE RÉGIONAL DE L'ARCHÉOLOGIE Projet Collectif de Recherche « Paléo Bretagne» LES PREMIERS PEUPLEMENTS DE L'OUEST DE LA FRANCE : DÉPÔTS PLÉISTOCÈNES ET OCCUPATIONS PALÉOLITHIQUES DE LA RÉGION BRETAGNE Rapport
  • coupes étudiées et les séquences de référence permettront ensuite d’affiner la chronostratigraphie générale des formations littorales pléistocènes de l’Ouest de la France. Ce cadre chronostratigraphique (Fig. 1) pourra être ensuite comparé aux séquences de régions voisines, comme le
  • Cotentin, les îles anglo-normandes, le Nord de la France ou le Sud de l’Angleterre, régions où la sédimentation est soumise, comme le Massif armoricain, aux variations du niveau marin et à un fort développement des accumulations lœssiques. Enfin, les occupations paléolithiques pourront
  • échantillons de Pen-Hat (Camaret-sur-Mer, 29) D. AOUSTIN 1 et C. LEROYER 2 1 CNRS/UMR 6566. Laboratoire Archéosciences, Campus de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes cedex, France. david.aoustin@univ-rennes1.fr 2 MC/UMR 6566. Laboratoire Archéosciences, Campus de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes cedex, France
RAP03316.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Ménez-Dregan 1 : des Prénéandertaliens aux Néandertaliens à l'extrême ouest de l'Europe. Rapport de FP)
  • », dans le cadre plus large de l’axe thématique Menez-Dregan Rapport2016 - 10 - « Évolution des sociétés : les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs » et son sous-axe : « Les peuplements paléolithiques de l’ouest de la France dans leur contexte européen ». Elle contribue aux axes
RAP03185.pdf ((22)(29)(35)(56). Les premiers peuplements de l'ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne. Rapport de PCR)
  • (22)(29)(35)(56). Les premiers peuplements de l'ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne. Rapport de PCR
  • /03/2015 : RAVON A.-L. & LAFORGE M., “Presentation of a new regional project: The first human settlements in North-Western France: pleistocene deposits and palaeolithic occupations in the Brittany region”, Jersey Research Meeting, Institute of Archaeology, Londres. 02/04/2015
  • of the Palaeolithic landscape at the western most tip of continental Europe: The shoreline seen by the Menez-Dregan dwellers. Environmental Archaeology, sous presse. MONNIER J.-L., RAVON A.-L., 2015 - Terra Amata et Menez-Dregan. Des industries du Paléolithique inférieur à rares bifaces et riches
  • systèmes techniques au Paléolithique ancien : quelle actualité ?, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense, Paris, 0810/10/14, pp. 47-51. RAVON A.-L., MONNIER J.-L., LAFORGE M., 2015 – Menez-Dregan, layer 4 : a transitional layer between the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in Brittany
  • of the Middle Paleolithic site of Piégu (Brittany, France). A multi-material approach. In : 13th International Conference on Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating, Torun, Poland, 10-14 July 2011, Quaternary Geochronology, LED2011 Special Issue, 10, 424-429. - BATES M.R., BATES C.R
  • DIRECTION RÉGIONALE DES AFFAIRES CULTURELLES DE BRETAGNE SERVICE RÉGIONAL DE L'ARCHÉOLOGIE Projet Collectif de Recherche LES PREMIERS PEUPLEMENTS DE L'OUEST DE LA FRANCE : DÉPÔTS PLÉISTOCÈNES ET OCCUPATIONS PALÉOLITHIQUES DE LA RÉGION BRETAGNE Rapport d'activité 2015 Anne-Lyse
  • l’enregistrement sédimentaire pléistocène armoricain. Les corrélations entre les coupes étudiées et les séquences de référence permettront ensuite d’affiner la chronostratigraphie générale des formations littorales pléistocènes de l’Ouest de la France. Ce cadre chronostratigraphique (fig. 1
  • ) sera ensuite comparé aux séquences de régions voisines, comme le Cotentin, les Iles anglo-normandes en Normandie, le Nord de la France ou le Sud de l’Angleterre, régions où la sédimentation est soumise, comme le Massif armoricain, aux variations du niveau marin et à un fort
  • analyse diachronique des dynamiques insulaires (culture, environnement et économie): l'île de Groix (Morbihan) comme étude de cas, In : Audouard L. & Gerhes B. (dir.), 2015. « Somewhere beyond the Sea » : Les îles bretonnes (France) : perspectives archéologiques, géographiques et
  • historiques / The islands of Brittany (France): an archaeological, geographical and historical point of view. Actes du Séminaire Archéologique de l’Ouest, Rennes, 1er avril 2014, BAR International Series 2705, Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1-13. LAFORGE M., BAHAIN J.-J., MONNIER J.-L., en prep
  • en galets aménagés du stade isotopique 11, Terra Amata, tome IV, pp. 750-754. MONNIER J.-L., RAVON A.-L., HINGUANT S., HALLÉGOUÊT B., GAILLARD C., LAFORGE M., sous presse – Menez-Dregan (Plouhinec, Finistère, France) : un site d'habitat du Paléolithique inférieur en grotte marine
  • l’environnement au Pléistocène dans l’Ouest de la France, In : Actes du Colloque international de Monaco, 2015, Bull. Mus. Anthropol. préhist. Monaco, suppl. n° 6, pp. 47-77. POPE M., SCOTT B., MILLS J., BATES M., BATES R., BLINKHORN E., CONNELLER C., DUFFY S., JULIEN M.-A., RAVON A.-L
  • ., SHAW A., sous presse - Discoveries From La Manche: Five years of Early Prehistoric Research in the Channel Island of Jersey. Archaeology International, sous presse. RAVON A.-L. & LAFORGE M., 2015 - Présentation du PCR: Les premiers peuplements de l’Ouest de la France : dépôts
  • , Quaternary International, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.066. RAVON A.-L., GAILLARD C., MONNIER J.-L., 2015 - Menez-Dregan (Plouhinec, Far Western Europe): the lithic industry from layer 7 and its Acheulian components, Quaternary International, sous presse. 5.2
  • – Communications 11/02/2015 : RAVON A.-L., “The Lower Palaeolithic in Brittany : between Acheulean and Colombanian”, Lithic Studies Society, Franks House, Département de Préhistoire du British Museum. 18/02/2015 : RAVON A.-L., “The Lower Palaeolithic in Brittany : between Acheulean
  • and Colombanian”, CAHO Seminars, University of Southampton. 21/03/2015 : RAVON A.-L. & LAFORGE M., « Présentation du PCR: Les premiers peuplements de l’Ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne », Journée scientifique de l’UMR 6566 du CNRS. 26
  • of palaeoenvironmental change on the palaeolithic settlements in Brittany?”, Conférence Unravelling the Palaeolithic, Southampton, 13-16 janvier 2016. - SHAW A., BATES M., BATES R., POPE M., RAVON A.-L., SCOTT B. : “Petit Portelet, Jersey: A new Neanderthal site in primary context”, Conférence
  • Unravelling the Palaeolithic, Southampton, 1316 janvier 2016. - RAVON A.-L., LAFORGE M. : « Variabilité climatique pléistocène en péninsule armoricaine : quelle peut être l’influence des changements paléoenvironnementaux sur les peuplements paléolithiques de Bretagne ? », Colloque Q10
  • ., GIBBARD P.L., MacPHAIL R.I., OWEN F.J., PARFITT S.A., PREECE R.C., ROBERTS M.B., ROBINSON J.E., WHITTAKER J.E., WILKINSON K.N. (2000) - Late Middle Pleistocene deposits at Norton Farm on the West Sussex coastal plain, southern England. Journal of Quaternary Science, 15 (1), 61-89
  • for Middle and Upper Pleistocene landscape evolution in the Sussex/Hampshire Coastal Corridor, UK. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 121, 369-392. - BIGOT B., MONNIER J.-L. (1987) - Stratigraphie et sédimentologie des lœss récents du nord de la Bretagne. Données nouvelles
  • d’après l’étude des coupes de Sables-d’Or-les-Pins et de Port-Lazo (Côtes du Nord, France). Bulletin de l’Association française pour l’Etude Quaternaire, 1, 27-36. - DUPEUBLE P.A., KNUDSEN K.L., LEFEBVRE D. (1984) - Les renseignements fournis par les foraminifères des terrasses de la
RAP02397.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Menez-Dregan I. rapport final de fp 2006-2008)
  • à l'extrême ouest de l'Eurasie », dans le cadre plus large de l'axe thématique de l'UMR 6566 « Evolution des sociétés : les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs » et son sous-axe : « les peuplements paléolithiques de l'Ouest de la France dans leur contexte européen » . Elle contribue
  • à l'extrême ouest de l'Eurasie » Opération « Menez-Dregan » Intégré aux axes suivants : Axe Thématique 1.1 : « Evolution des sociétés : les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs» (resp. Grégor Marchand) Sous-axe 1.1.2 : « les peuplements paléolithiques de l'Ouest de la France dans
  • Préhistoire et Quaternaire, UPRESA 8018, UFR DE GEOGRAPHIE, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex France Tél: 33 (0)3 20 33 6278 ; fax: 33 (0)3 20 43 66 77 E-Mail : patrick.auguste@univ-lille1.fr BAHAIN Jean-Jacques : Institut de Paléontologie
  • genre connue dans le nord-ouest de la France, est caractérisée par des outils à tranchant aménagé sur galets associés à un outillage léger, sur éclats de petites dimensions (encoches, denticulés), et par le caractère « clactonien » du débitage. La multiplication des gisements de ce
  • actuellement sous la mer. D'après la carte géologique de la France au 1/1000000 ème, Ces affleurements (Crétacé supérieur) se situent à l'ouest de la baie d'Audierne (cf. carte ci-dessous : couleur vert pâle). 12 13 d'Audierne, au plus près à 40 km de distance au large de la pointe de
  • question et défend certaines hypothèses. Si l'on peut parler de faciès régional pour les industries à galets aménagés du littoral sud-armoricain, il est difficile de le distinguer totalement de l'Acheuléen du nord de la France. Ces industries armoricaines pourraient en effet
  • de Pors Poulhan (carte géologique de la France au 1/50000, feuille Pont-Croix, 1981). Il s'agit d'un granité porphyroïde mis en place vers 345 M.A., au début du Dinantien, aux dépens de greywackes affleurant largement plus au sud, ainsi que sur les fonds de la baie d'Audierne en
RAP02270.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). rapport sur la campagne de fouille 2007 du gisement paléolithique inférieur de menez drégan 1. rapport 2007 de fp 3 (2006-2008))
  • la France, est caractérisée par des outils à tranchant aménagé sur galets associés à un outillage léger, sur éclats de petites dimensions (encoches, denticulés), et par le caractère « clactonien » du débitage. La multiplication des gisements de ce type, sur la côte sud armoricaine
  • proximité des affleurements crétacés actuellement sous la mer. D'après la carte géologique de la France au 1/1000000 ème, Ces affleurements (Crétacé supérieur) se situent à l'ouest de la baie 7 8 d'Audierne, au plus près à 40 km de distance au large de la pointe de Penmarch. Leur
  • certaines hypothèses. Si l'on peut parler de faciès régional pour les industries à galets aménagés du littoral sud-armoricain, il est difficile de le distinguer totalement de l'Acheuléen du nord de la France. Ces industries armoricaines pourraient en effet correspondre à des aires
  • (carte géologique de la France au 1/50000, feuille Pont-Croix, 1981). Il s'agit d'un granité porphyroïde mis en place vers 345 M.A., au début du Dinantien, aux dépens de greywackes affleurant largement plus au sud, ainsi que sur les fonds de la baie d'Audierne en avant des falaises du
RAP03345.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil : Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP)
  • avant notre ère, il est très homogène et exempt de perturbations ultérieures. Aussi représente-t-il un témoin unique des modes de vie des chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de la France atlantique. Sa rapide détérioration par l’érosion marine et anthropique a entraîné la mise en place
  • Département du Morbihan et le Service régional de l’archéologie. Ces trois années de fouille de 2012 à 1015 (23 semaines) ont livré des résultats particulièrement pertinents pour la compréhension des derniers groupes de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de la France atlantique. Pour la
  • première fois en France, un niveau coquillier mésolithique a pu être fouillé en même temps que ses abords. Par ailleurs, le protocole de collecte systématique des vestiges par tamisage à l’eau (4 et 2 mm), puis tri à sec en laboratoire, livre une qualité d’information insurpassable. Une
  • un débitage sur petits galets de silex d’éclats et de lames courtes. Encore une fois, nous observons une séquence laminaire régulière tirée à la percussion indirecte, mais en proportions infimes en comparaison d’autres industries du second Mésolithique en France. L’outillage
  • , dessins et peintures, à la fois esthétiques et érudites. • Monsieur Dominique Hillion, pour ses informations très pertinentes sur les ouvrages militaires historiques de Beg-er-Vil. • Madame Laurence Forin (Télégramme) et Madame Caroline Moreau (Ouest-France) pour leur suivi médiatique
  • l’intervalle de datation étroit font de Beg-er-Vil une référence exceptionnelle pour le second Mésolithique en Europe atlantique. L’habitat de Beg-er-Vil est encore bien seul dans l’Ouest de la France pour cet intervalle chronologique de la fin du 7ème millénaire avant notre ère. Par les
  • de Rennes 1 Analyse anthracologique Nancy Marcoux UMR 6566 CReAAH– Université de Rennes 1 Analyse carpologique Marie-France Diestch-Sellami INRAP GSO - UMR 5059, Centre de BioArchéologie et d'Ecologie, Institut de Botanique, / Montpellier Étude de la faune mammalienne Anne
RAP04077 (Menez-Dregan I. Sécurisation des dépôts restants. Sondages. Opération programmée)
RAP03499 (PLOUHINEC (29). Ménez-Drégan : Des Prénéandertaliens aux Néandertaliens à l'extrème ouest de l'Europe. Rapport de FP 2017)