Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Auteur
Type d'opération
Commune
Département
Date (Année)

685 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP03967 (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil à Quiberon. Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de fouille programmée 2020 )
RAP03817 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de l'Holocène. Rapport de FP 2019)
RAP03240.pdf (PLOUEZOC'H (29). Grand cairn de Barnenez : nouvelles approches, nouveaux résultats, nouvelles perspectives. Rapport de FP 2015)
  • royale belge d’Anthropologie et de Préhistoire: 259276. Laporte L. 2010a: Innate and/or expressed identities: Their conceptualization through monumentality, funerary practices and grave goods? Some examples from the megalithic tradition of western France., Journal of Neolithic
RAP03961 (MAEN ROCH (35). ZAC Saint-Eustache. Rapport de diagnostic)
  • a été sondé dans le segment F 30 par le sondage sd4 (fig. 18 et 19). 38 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic Maen-Roch (35) ZAC Saint-Eustache - 2019-447 Secteur 2 sondages sondage Tranchées Emprise datation structures protohistoire moderne contemporain non daté selection zone
  • protohistoire moderne contemporain non daté selection Fig. 18 : localisation des segments de fossés pouvant être protohistorique © Jean-Claude Durand 43 II. Résultats F 30 et 36 Tr5 Sd4 119,25 m NGF NNE SSO F 30 F 36 1 1 Tr5F30sd4 F 36 - 1 : limono-sableux brun riche en arène 0
  • Nicolas, DAO structures : Jean-Claude Durand 44 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic Maen-Roch (35) ZAC Saint-Eustache - 2019-447 Secteur 1 Tranchées Emprise datation structures protohistoire moderne contemporain non daté selection Fig. 20 : localisation des fosses F 23 et 45 © Jean
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • collection; phosphate analysis and soil magnetic susceptibil ity survey of the four selected areas; and excavation of part of a bank and lynchet near a field from which 'total' collection had previously been made. Three days (21-23 March) were spent in préparation by three people
  • , 1984b). The latter analysis has been completed and, as demonstrated below, is of particular significance for fieldwork. The 1985 season involved fieldwalking over large areas at wide intervais, as in 1982 - 84; fieldwalking four selected areas in 5m squares for 'total' surface
  • ; the main team (consisting largely of past and présent students from the Universities of London and Reading) numbered twenty-two, including the directors; it worked for twel ve days, from 24 March, and had one day off; nine people (including one director) remained for an additional week
  • covered, encompassing 772 hectares (4.01% of the surface area of the four communes). 30.99kg of pottery and 93.92kg of man-made building material were recovered from the transects; 45% of the pottery was médiéval, 53.6% post-medieval and 1.4% Roman. No pre-Roman pottery was found
  • , but sixteen worked flints were recovered, three from transect L, three from C and ten from F, and also a stone axe, the stone of which has yet to be identified (F117). Two possible areas of ridge and furrow were noted, along with fourteen lynchets and eight (mostly substantial) old banks
  • cadastre, as usual. More than three-quarters of the concentrations (80.2%) lay more than 100m away from early nineteenth-century settlements and only 7.5% lay within 50m of them. (This is not signif icantly différent from distances from modem settlements). Surface material tends
  • in the Coet Morel /Hôtel Orl and area (Carentoir). Surface material is markedly absent from fields on the northern and southern boundaries of L, on the east/west ridges (particularly on a band north west of Carentoir) and - as might be expected - on most steep slopes. There are again
  • or schi ste; the imported material is notably absent from fields cleared of woodl and since the 1 ate nineteenth century. Fieldwalking in 5m squares ('Total' Coll ecti on ) In order to investigate the nature of sites identified in transect walking, as in 1983 and 1984 some fields
  • samples for future phosphate analysis were taken from the topsoil in ail squares, at 5m intervais, and soil magnetic suscepti bi 1 i ty readings were also taken at 5m intervais, at the spot from which samples had been lifted. Fluxgate gradiometer readings were not taken since 1984
  • tests suggested that thèse were only useful if taken at much narrower intervais. Schiste was collected, totally from A107, D221 and B216, and in a limited sample from B347 (from one square in every nine). This was subsequently classified in three colour catégories (black/grey, green
  • was recorded, the field being the same size and shape as at présent but divided into bandes; an area of 1 ande lay to the north and the nearest settlement (La Boulardaie) lay 130m away. Pottery, building material and schi ste were collected from an area of 1 hectare, distributed ail over
  • size is 0.44 hectare. In the early nineteenth century it was part of an area of water meadow, 250m from the nearest settlement of Le Cleu. 0.3 Roman sherds per square were collected (2.11g), with 0.4 médiéval sherds (1.63g), 0.31 post-medieval sherds (1.71g) and 2.38 fragments
  • . As with field 0221, this cl ustering was sufficiently pronounced (and sufficiently distinct from the distribution of médiéval and post-medieval pottery) to suggest that a Roman-period structure once stood on the field. Magnetic susceptibil ity readings produced unusually high values
  • to the bedrock. Quantities of natural schi ste from this field were enormous, some squares producing 45kg; the sampling strategy proved to be of very limited value since it was impossible to gain a sensé of overall distribution and difficult to correl ate the collected squares with the cl
  • of the 18 mètre squares) was dug. Soil samples for micromorphol ogical and pollen analysis were taken in columns from the sections, using purpose-made meta! containers. Small test holes were also eut by machine at every 15m to the north of Trench 1 (up the side of the south-facing valley
  • the same alignaient as the lynchet. The ditch was fi 1 1 ed with a homogeneous silty loam which contained two sherds of médiéval pottery and two pièces of (? médiéval) tile. The fill of the ditch was indistinguishable from the overlying thick 1 ayer of loam, which constituted the main
  • of the lynchet (1.8m), indicating notable col 1 uvi ation . The schi ste recovered from the lynchet was not derived from the yellowish-red type which constituted the natural bedrock in the trench. Most was of a grey/green colour. The greatest amounts were recovered at depths of between 5
  • and tile coul d indicate that this happened before brick and tile were in common use. Both trenches have shown that lynchets could have a complicated history, with their origins in other features. From the point of view of land-use history, the pottery suggests that this area of Ruffiac
  • commune was intensively cultivated from the 1 ater twelfth century (although small amounts of earlier pottery could reflect earlier activity), while the absence of early post-medieval wares suggests a lapse in arable cultivation during the early modem period or changes in manuring
  • practice. Since the two trenches showed différent amounts of soil buildup and material in the two areas, changes in manuring practice rather than lapse in cultivation may be more relevant in explaining the data from Trench 1. The land-use around Trench 2 clearly changed when
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • /79, H 132, 874, L26, D153) from which 'total' collection had previously been made (fig. 1). Of thèse, A92 had been started in 1986 and remained to finish. The ai rn of thèse smal 1 excavations was the investigation of surf ace/'sub-surf ace rel at i onshi ps; fields were selected
  • of the relationship between land-use and settlement during the 1 ast two thousand years, took place from 25 August - 1 October in the communes of Ruffiac, Tréal , St-Ni col as-du-Tertre and Carentoir, in the department of Morbihan in eastern Brittany. The ai m of the study is to détermine when
  • five-day planning trips by two in September 1987 and April 1988. The team, consisting of volunteers from a wide range of places, numbered twenty-six, including the directors, one finds assistant and three supervisors; it worked for f i ve weeks from 28 August, with four days off
  • , and only two days were lost because of rain; however , the gênerai dryness meant that the ground was hard and made for very heavy working. EBS 88 B409 (Carentoir Zft 161) B409 lies on a west-facing si ope near the settlement of Le Eiois Guillaume, documentée! from the eighteenth
  • pottery (maximum 5 sherds per square) was more evenly spread. Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile (maximum 0 .5kg per square) were uhevenl y distributed, but tended to concentrate in the south of the field, away from the cl Lister i ng of pre—médiéval and médiéval pottery
  • , and the majority (577.) of the post-medi eval wares was ni neteenth-century . Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile were recovered but only from the first three spits (total 23 fragments, 0. 787kg) . Context 1, however, had in addition to local quartz and quartzite large quantities (120kg
  • some pièces were 5mm across. This layer varied in thickness -from 0.75m on the eastern, up-slope, side o-f the trench to 0.38m on the west. At the east end the top sur-face o-f 2 curved as i -f the layer had been mounded up. This layer could not be total ly excavated over the whole
  • o-f the trench because o-f lack of space for the spoil, so the trench was reduced in size to 6 X 3m. The pottery from this layer (2), like the stone fragments, provides a complète contrast with that of the plough soil. 61 sherds were found, ail of which were Irôn Age, the most
  • . The range o-f pottery recovered -from the top two spits was very différent -from the lowest spit. In the first twenty centimètres 45 sherds were -found; médiéval pottery predominated (837.), -followed by post-medi eval (157.) and a single sherd o-f Roman pottery (27.) ; 52 -fragments o-f
  • -orange clay (24) from the surface of which came 20 sherds of Iron-Age pottery, the majority of which were of Fabrics 86 (607) and 89 (257). There was no sign of feat ures eut into this layer, which 1 ay directly on the degraded, manganèse— stai ned , quartzitic bedrock (05a) (33
  • ) . Comment The occurrence of médiéval and post-medi eval pottery in the plough soil, but not beneath , and the lack of conte;-; ts of thèse période would suggest that this matériel was not deriyed from SLib— surface features. Manuring might wel 1 account for the evenly distributed
  • is a good indicator of settlement in the near vicinity. In the case of the test pit T37 prehistoric pottery was recovered from the surface, but there were no sub-surface features of that date. It is impossible to suggest reasons for the soning of the prehistoric material on the surface
  • without more extensive investigation. The séquence from T36 is important. The trench was sited on the highest part of the field, near the top of the slope, yet it has a much deeper stratification than T37 lower down the slope. The buried soil 32, with its charcoal, might represent
  • Df the material in it, do not however suggest a midden but rather collapsed walls or some sort of bank. The absence of Roman material from the dump suggests that it was formed before the Roman period: the few Roman sherds found in the topsoil could have been derived from a very
  • Roman site in the vicinity, and a few sherds in the topsoil, there is no trace of Roman settlement on this field and little to suggest Roman agricultural use. Présent évidence might suggest that the médiéval pottery in the plough soil derived from very heavy manuring, although
  • the stone in the plough soil of T36 included plenty of introduced building stone, which must have been carried more than 1 km to this spot; this stone, then, may in tact dérive from the collapse of some nearby structure of médiéval date (cf. H132 below). It is just possible
  • Roux) documented from eighteenth and fifteenth centuries respect! vel y , with a possible médiéval structure near T36 (see fig. 2). It is potentially of the highest significance for long—terni settlement history and would merit a much more extensive investigation. A92 (Ruffiac
  • sett 1 ement . In 1986 the plough soil in T2B
  • material was obtained from T29 (as was reflected by the results D -f the total collection) but more Roman pottery was found. Time ran ont and the sites had to be backfilled at the point, when ditches were recognised (Asti 13. and Davies 1987, 118-21). In 1988 the excavation was resumed
  • of charcoal would suggest a quick and deliberate backfill of this ditch. There was, however, a patch of charcoal (20) in the upper part of 16 at the west end of the ditch. No pottery was recovered from the upper fill but in context 17 were a near-compl ete terra-ni qra bowl with a foot
RAP01557.pdf (PLOULEC'H (22). le Yaudet. rapport final de synthèse de fouille programmée 1996-1998)
RAP03345.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil : Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP)
RAP01768.pdf (le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
RAP04033 (RENNES (35). 18 allée Coysevox. Rapport de fouille)
RAP01858.pdf (les sites mésolithiques en Bretagne. rapport de 1re année de projet collectif de recherche)
  • demeure de leurs inventeurs les squelettes n° 18, 19 et 21 de Téviec, ont disparu pendant l'occupation de cette ville, au cours de la guerre 1939-1945. Les documents de fouille. L'exploitation du fond photographique et des archives cinématographiques, réalisés par les Péquart lors de
RAP03493 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport intermédiaire de FP)
RAP04028 (AMANLIS (35). Le Bois de Teillay, tranche 1 : Occupations funéraires protohistoriques et établissement rural du bas Moyen Âge. Rapport de fouille)
  • , post holes, an area of artisan oven, a pond and a well which yielded a complete set of pots dating from the fourteenth century. At least the third sector (Zone 3: 8442 montains remains of three different period. To the north, traces of cooking pit are related to Middle Neolithic
  • by the remains of an oven and some pits. Forty meters east of this enclosure, a group of hollow structure remains a settlement dating back to the early Iron Age probably related to the funeray square enclosure. Finally, a system of plot ditches as well as a road from the Modern period partly
RAP03801 (Corpus des signes gravés néolithiques, Art rupestre néolithique en Armorique. Rapport PCR.)
RAP03771 (VANNES (56). 28 rue du 8 mai 1945. Rapport de diagnostic)
  • VANNES (56). 28 rue du 8 mai 1945. Rapport de diagnostic
  • Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 Moyen Âge, Temps modernes, Époque contemporaine Sujets et thèmes Édifice religieux, Bâtiment Suite à la demande de permis de construire n° PC 056 260 16 Y 0063 présentée par la société LAMOTTE Construction, pour un terrain situé 28, rue
  • du 8 mai 1945 à Vannes (56), le Service Régional de l’Archéologie a saisi l’Inrap afin de réaliser un diagnostic archéologique sur les parcelles concernées. Les parcelles BP 409, 410, 253p, 254, 251, 250, 248 et 247 du cadastre actuel représentent une surface de 2140 m². Mobilier
  • Industrie lithique, Céramique Diagnostic archéologique Époque médiévale, bas Rapport d’opération Chronologie Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 Diagnostic archéologique L’intervention a permis la découverte de plusieurs traces d’occupation : de nombreuses maçonneries, un
  • www.inrap.fr Inrap Grand Ouest août 2019 Diagnostic archéologique Rapport d’opération Diagnostic archéologique 56260 Code INSEE — D115435 2016 - 177 Système d’information Code Inrap Arrêté de prescription Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 sous la direction de avec la
  • -Sévigné Statut du terrain au regard des législations sur le patrimoine et l’environnement Dates d’intervention sur le terrain Bretagne Département Morbihan (56) Commune Vannes Adresse ou lieu-dit 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 Intégré au zonage archéologique sensible Codes Références
  • de l’opération Céline Baudoin, Inrap 17 au 19 juin 2019 Surface prescrite et sondée Emprise maximale prescrite 2140 m2 Surface sondée 218 m2 soit 10,19 % de l'emprise maximale prescrite 8 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945
  • post-fouille 10 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 Notice scientifique État du site Suite à la demande de permis de construire n° PC 056 260 16 Y 0063 présentée par la société LAMOTTE Construction, pour un terrain situé 28, rue
  • du 8 mai 1945 à Vannes (56), le Service Régional de l’Archéologie a saisi l’Inrap afin de réaliser un diagnostic archéologique sur les parcelles concernées. Les parcelles BP 409, 410, 253p, 254, 251, 250, 248 et 247 du cadastre actuel représentent une surface de 2140 m². Trois
  • scientifiques 11 Localisation de l’opération Bretagne, Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 x : 1267780 y : 7178388 (Lambert CC48) z : 10 m NGF Saint-Brieuc Quimper Vannes 0 localisation du diagnostic archéologique Rennes 100 km 0 1 km Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945
  • 14 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 I. Données administratives, techniques et scientifiques 15 16 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 I. Données administratives
  • , techniques et scientifiques 17 18 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 I. Données administratives, techniques et scientifiques 19 20 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Projet scientifique d’intervention Morbihan, Vannes
  • , 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 I. Données administratives, techniques et scientifiques 21 22 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Arrêté de désignation Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 I. Données administratives, techniques et scientifiques 23 II. Résultats
  • II. Résultats 27 1. Le cadre de l'opération 1267800 1267750 1.1 Circonstances de l’intervention Suite à la demande de permis de construire n° PC 056 260 16 Y 0063 présentée par la société LAMOTTE Construction, pour un terrain situé 28 rue du 8 mai 1945 à Vannes (56), le
  • , Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 La rue du 8 mai 1945, anciennement rue de la Boucherie, appartenait au faubourg du Bourg Maria. Situé en périphérie immédiate de l’enceinte, le secteur est pour la première fois mentionné au XIIe s. comme fief du prieuré de Saint-Martin de Josselin
  • (Lallemand, 1838). Dans le courant du Moyen Age, le quartier prend le nom du Mené puis de la Boucherie lors du déplacement de cette activité dans le secteur (Martin, 1921). L’essentiel de son développement viendra plus tard de l’implantation de moulins en lien avec la rivière de Rohan et
  • , 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 2.1 La tranchée 1 La tranchée 1 mesure 32 m de long. Elle a été réalisée d’ouest en est dans la partie la plus au nord de l’emprise. Les affleurements rocheux apparaissent en moyenne à 0,50 cm sous le niveau de sol actuel. Les vestiges mis en évidence dans
  • de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 À l’extrémité est de la tranchée 2, un troisième muret a pu être dégagé. Le muret 206 orienté est/ouest est en fait la suite du muret 205. Il présente sensiblement les mêmes caractéristiques que ce dernier (Fig
  • Fig. 11A Le mur 303. © Céline Baudoin Fig. 11B Les murs 309, 305 et 304. © Céline Baudoin Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 II. Résultats 35 Enfin des cailloux disposés en arc de cercle dont un présentant des traces d’usure constituent le dernier aménagement maçonné (US
  • , Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 3. Notice sur le mobilier par Françoise Labaune-Jean L’intervention de diagnostic archéologique menée en juin 2019 au numéro 28 de la rue du 8 mai à Vannes a livré un lot de mobilier très restreint. Celui-ci provient uniquement de la tranchée 1
  • installation à Vannes. © Ouest-France emprise de la prescription archéologique tranchée 0 20 mètres 38 Inrap · Rapport de diagnostic archéologique Morbihan, Vannes, 28, rue du 8 mai 1945 5. Bibliographie Bélanger 2016 BELANGER (C.) — Place de Nazareth, Vannes (Morbihan), Rapport