Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Type d'opération
Date (Année)

374 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • , and the majority (577.) of the post-medi eval wares was ni neteenth-century . Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile were recovered but only from the first three spits (total 23 fragments, 0. 787kg) . Context 1, however, had in addition to local quartz and quartzite large quantities (120kg
  • was built and may have been made redundant by its construction - hence the fills. Although, then, excavation of A92 was very limited, it cl earl y demonstrates that. there was a Roman-period building on or near the ridge, which was occupied in the first and second centuries
  • Asti II and Davies 1985, 90-5; and below, D153) . With the exception of the features at the bottom of the slope which are associated with modem attempts at drainage, the pottery suggests that ail the pits and ditches ware filled in or after the first and second centuries AD
  • , it looks as if the field was used for agriculture at a time when firstand second-centur y pottery was being discarded; in this case the ditches are likely to have been field or enclosure ditches of the first and/or second century. It is clear from the worn condition of the pot
  • . To a certain ex tent the results from A31/79 are similar to those from A92, one and a half km away, despite the considérable différence in data derived from the surface. Both sites are located on ridges and both suggest nearby structures occupiéd during the first and second centuries AD
  • was completed in 1987, and a survey of ail standing buildings in the core in 1986. The complète study involves (amongst other éléments) analysis of documents, including the very détail ed cadastral maps and records of the early ni neteenth century. Thèse latter analyses have been completed
  • ; the cadastral work allows total reconstruction of the early rà neteenth- century ] andscape and is of parti cul ar value for the fieldwork programme (Asti 11 and Davies 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987)." The 1988 season involved sample excavation of parts of seven fields (B409, A92, A31
  • century as a metai rie (fig. 2). The field was permanent meadow in the early nineteenth century. In 1982 it was walked at 50m intervais and was classified as a 'médiéval site'; some Roman pottery was also recovered. In 1987 the field was gridded in 5m squares and walked for 'total
  • . The range o-f pottery recovered -from the top two spits was very différent -from the lowest spit. In the first twenty centimètres 45 sherds were -found; médiéval pottery predominated (837.), -followed by post-medi eval (157.) and a single sherd o-f Roman pottery (27.) ; 52 -fragments o-f
  • Roux) documented from eighteenth and fifteenth centuries respect! vel y , with a possible médiéval structure near T36 (see fig. 2). It is potentially of the highest significance for long—terni settlement history and would merit a much more extensive investigation. A92 (Ruffiac
  • ) and A31/79 below, suggest a firstand second-century date for the occupation of the nearby, but still unlocated, structure. The later ditch (11) was filled with structural material from this building. The absence of post-second-century pottery from the excavations and fieldwalking
  • suggests that the building did not stand long after the second century, and hence that this ditch fill from the building took place at or shortly after that time. It is difficult to suggest a function for the earlier ditch (5 and 10) other than for drainage. The présence of Iron-Age
  • and was destroyed or collap>sed in the second century, with no subséquent occupation of that parti cul ar site. A31/79 (Ru-ffiac ZN 119) A3 1/79 is situated 4 00m north of Petit Madou in Ruffiac; it stretches from the crest of a ridge on the 40m contour down the north-east slope of a small
  • valley. Near the top of the slope and near the valley bottom are two breaks of slope which follow the contours and could therefore be lynchets or river terraces (fig. tf.) . The ancien cadastre shows this area to have been arable in the early nineteenth century. The two fields A31
  • and A79 were first walked at 50m intervais in 1982; the material which was recovered concentrated where the two fields joined and was classified as a 'probable médiéval site'; Roman pottery was also noted. The field boundaries were subséquent 1 y changed and the eastern part of A31 has
  • intercutting pits. Pit 32 (0.62m in diameter, 0.15m deep) had been the first to be eut and bac kfi lied (31); it contained 1 sherd of late Iron-Age/earl y Roman pottery. Two pits were then dug partly into 32 and 31 and partly into the natural. Both were about 0.5m in diameter and 0.1m deep
  • to have been a Spanish amphora; the upper fill (58) produced no finds. The eastern edge of the ditch had been eut into by a group of four pits. Pit 77 was dug first, and then three more -71, 73 and 75: none of the fills produced finds (76, 70, 72, 74). A mètre down slope
  • the second century, or even in the prehi stor i c period, since i t does not respect, any of the? demonstrâbly Roman ditches or pits (see fig. 4). It is, however, différent from other s that have been excavated: the 1 ynchet lacks a ditch or bank at its core, as did Tl , T2, and T35 (see
  • 0.3kg per square) of brick and tile. The field is lowlyinq and located 100m east of the Château de la Ruée, to the? east of Ruffiac (fi g. 6). The a n c ien çadas t. r e records this field as permanent meadow in the early nineteenth century but it also shows that it forméd part
  • of an area around the château which had been landscaped to create wide avenues, fishponds, meadow and large rectangular blocks of arable near métairies. The château has several lintels dated to the 1660s and had clearly been built by the late seventeenth century; the area may already have
RAP00869.pdf (PENESTIN (56). lotissement de Lomer. rapport de sauvetage urgent)
  • RAPPORT DE SONDAGE PJ5EE3TIÎÎ - LE LOMBR, OPERATION REALISEE LE 04 KARS 1981. Participants à l'opération : Yvon LABORDSRIE ,Cité Plein Ciel,Bât G à Vannes. Christian GOURET,Atelier de Kerinadeleine,Pénestin. Joël LSCORfflî;C,Gorrespondànt du Service,2 rue Rodin à Vanne s
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • between one rira found at HSO and one from A92 (see fig» 6, HBO-5 and A92-2) would perhaps argue for a date that spans the first centuries BC and AD» The 'Roman' character of the assemblage might also be suggested by the substantiel tiles for, although not very wel 1 fired
  • nineteenth century» This latter analysis has been completed and is of parti cul. ar significance for fieldwork because it allows complète reconstruction of the early ni neteenth-century landscape (Astill and Davies 1982a, 1983, 1984, 1985). THE EASTER SEASON The 19S6 Easter season
  • the ancien cadastre , as usua 1 . More than three-quarters of concentrations of pottery (76.7V.) 1 ay more than 100m away from early n i net eenth-century settlements and only 12» 5% 1 ay within 50m of them» (The former is only slightly higher than distances from modem settlements
  • and the latter proportion the same.) Surface material tends to be found within areas of ni net eenth-century arable, as always especially in bandes (1 itérai ly 'bande' , arable divided into tenant parcels) and the proportion was comparable?, though slightly smal 1er, with that of earlier
  • years (58,9% of concentrations in 1986, as compared with 70. 1% in 1985). The remainder occurred in n i net eenth-century meadow or pasture (an unusually high 12.5%), marginal 1 an de ( un c u 1 1 i vat ed land 10.77.), curtilage (5.47.) Concentrations of material in and areas
  • of mixed 1 and— use. 1 an des (like B2S and D52) and meadow early ni net eenth-century (ilke BS7 and B90) demand some further investigation, since they previous to the nineteenth imply either arable use or settlement century; sites 1 i ke G21S, 220 and 221, lying in the di sti net i vel
  • . The first (T7) ran north west from T3 across a slight break in si ope, and the other two (T5 and T6) were eut in order to section the platform near T4 (see fig. C) . The-? sections were cleaned and drawn and features in the bottom of the trenches recorded. The two 6m squares were mai ni
  • was found on the surfaice (see Table 3),, Identification of the lynchet by T4, T5 and T6 confirma the 1985 resuit s suggested by T2? the lower si opes of the valley had been in arable use in the médiéval period but had been turned over to meadow by the nineteenth century, perhaps
  • by the early post médiéval period (Asti 11 and Davies 1985s 92-5, 97)» If the occupation in T4 is prehistoric then it is the first of its kind for the? région and has important implications for survey work» Its low-lying position, in a wet valley bottom and sealed by 70cm of colluvium
  • because it shows that that part of Quoiqueneuc was occupied by the thirteenth century; hence, the buildings recorded in the ancien cadastre on the edge of H 145 did not represent a post-medi eval extension of an earlier settlement. , but an aspect of the médiéval settlement pattern i t
  • ; field names (landes and f ri ches) over the whole area indicate that it had not been characteri st i cal 1 y cultivated before the 1820s. The field was first wal ked in 1984 and was classified as a 'possible site' (médiéval). In April 1986 it was intensively wal ked and this produced
  • the first trench was placed over one of the 'concentrations' of Iron Age pottery. Initial ly ai 6m square (T15) was excavated as at Al 16, A92 and H145, and then five trenches (1 mètre wide) were eut north-south across the field at 30m intervais using a machine (from west to east. T16/17
  • century and nothing suggests that the structure was of greater antiquity than that. Ditch détails IA = Iron Age pottery No. Width Depth Shape (m) (m) T15/4 .50-70 .50 ^ J . 85 . 80 2-2 . 70 . 78 . 78 .50 . 48 . 70 . 90 1 50 T16/8 . 58 T16/9 . 70 T16/56 T16/23 1 . 70 . 30 T 16/24 1.0
RAP01768.pdf (le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
  • organisé par Damien Leroy et Christian Verjux du Service régional de l'Archéologie de la région Centre. Ces manifestations comprendront des communications de membres de ce PCR. Enfin, Anne Tresset et Grégor Marchand organisent une journée de la Société Préhistorique Française les 26 et
RAP00321.pdf (LA CHAPELLE DES FOUGERETZ (35). le Bas Plessis. rapport de sauvetage urgent.)
  • Christian antiquities of the British Museum,London,1902. -de Fréminville= Fréminville, Restes d'un établissement gallo-romain découvert au Lodo,commune d'Arradon,Bulletin de la société archéologique du Morbihan,1857,p 53. ~Galliou,1974= P.Galliou, Deux mobiliers d'époque romaine
  • , A corpus of Roman engraved gemstones from British site;: Oxford,1974,2 vols.(B.A.R,8). -Higgins,1961= R.A Higgins, Greek and Roman jewelIry, London,1961. -Iliffe,1934= J.H Iliffe, Rock-cut tomb at Tarshiha.Late IVth century, The Quarterly of the department of antiquities of Palestine
RAP02132.pdf (SAINT-IGEAUX (22). le site de Kerboar. nouvelles découvertes. rapport de sondage dans le cadre de la prospection)
  • a grandement facilité la réalisation de cette petite opération, en se chargeant sur place des autorisations nécessaires et en nous invitant, le midi, chez sa mère qui nous a offert de succulents repas. Un grand merci également à Christian Le Baron, propriétaire de la parcelle, qui nous
  • membres de son service participent à cette fouille. Ont participé à cette opération, outre Yves Menez et Muriel Fily, Thierry Lorho et Christine Boujot, du Service régional de l'archéologie, Claudine Bernard, Christian Le Baron, François Le Provost, François et Geneviève Buguellou
  • extrait cadastral où ont été indiquées les limites de l'enclos. Conservateur régional de l'archéologie. M. Christian Le Baron, propriétaire de la parcelle, et M. Bernard Querré, exploitant, ont également donné leur accord à la réalisation de cette petite opération, qui s'est déroulée
  • . Cet élément est attribuable à l'âge du Bronze. En effet dans l'ouvrage intitulé Les Ors Préhistoriques, Christiane Eluère évoque ce type de parure. Plusieurs exemples en sont connus, notamment dans le dépôt de Kerviltré dans le Finistère, où deux perles composites à 4 anneaux
  • section rubanée découvert à Saint-Marc-Le-Blanc au lieu-dit Champ des Longrais en Ille-et-Vilaine. Ce bracelet comporte également 6 annelets mais n'a pas été enroulé sur lui-même lors de son enfouissement. Christiane Eluère décrit le bracelet de Saint-Marc-LeBlanc comme « un simple
  • rasoir, ainsi que la découverte de 7 parures ou fragments de parures en or dispersés, peut-être issus d'un autre dépôt dispersé par les labours, demeure exceptionnelle. Avec une grande générosité, Claudine Bernard, inventrice de la plupart des objets, et Christian Le Baron
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • by smelting iron ore in shaf t f urnaces; that from R9, however, weighed 2kg and came from the bottoms of bowl furnaces; first- and second-century pottery was collected from the surface in this 6 area. This season 's work has produced several indications that the core communes
  • éléments) analysis of documents, including the very detailed cadastral maps and records of the early nineteenth century. This latter analysis has been completed and is of psrticular significance for fieldwork since it allows complète reconstruction of the early ni neteenth-century
  • ' areas in which nothing - or virtually nothing - can be found on the surface. It looks as if thèse 'blanks' are fields on land not cultivated in the historic period until the twentieth century; sometimes they are in areas clearly utilized as woodland until very recently. In P
  • . Previous work suggests that they reached the fields in the course of manuring and are therefore probably a useful indicator of pre-twenti eth-century manuring patterns. As in the core communes and in Transect N, it is again notable in thèse sample transects that there are some areas
RAP01676.pdf (VANNES (56). la marée bleue. rapport de diagnostic)
  • GENERIQUE DE L'OPERATION Intervenants techniques et scientifiques : Responsable de l'opération et titulaire de l'autorisation : Laurent AUBRY, assistant d'études A.F.A.N. Equipe de diagnostic : Christian LE GOFFIC, technicien supérieur A.F.A.N. Suivi du diagnostic : Laurent AUBRY et
  • Christian LE GOFFIC. Relevés de terrain : Laurent AUBRY et Christian LE GOFFIC. Mise au net de la documentation graphique : Laure SIMON, assistante d'études A.F.A.N Photographie : Laurent AUBRY. Lavage et conditionnement du mobilier : Laure SIMON. Archivage : Laurent AUBRY. Intervenants
RAP03967 (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil à Quiberon. Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de fouille programmée 2020 )
RAP03896 (RIEUX (56). Le Clos Macé. Rapport de sondages archéologiques)
  • , Christian HOUZE, Lucie JEANNERET, Marion LECONTE, Jean-François LYVINEC, Bernard MONNIER, Dany NUE, Corentin OLIVIER, Thibaut PERES, Jean PETAT, Marc PISIGO, Bruno RÉGENT, Maryvonne REYNTJES, Jean-Claude SICARD, Daniel TATIBOUËT, Monique THUREAU, Germaine TOULLIOU, Alain TRISTE Centre
  • affaires culturelles, service régional de l’archéologie dont le conservateur régional, Monsieur Stéphane Deschamps, le conservateur régional adjoint, Monsieur Yves Menez et les conservateurs en charge du département du Morbihan successifs, Messieurs Christian Cribellier et Jocelyn
  • de la médiathèque de Rieux, dans le cadre des journées de l’archéologie de 2015. - L’entreprise de terrassement EURL Morgan Guerin TP pour le décapage de l’emprise de fouille et pour être intervenue une seconde fois en cours de fouille. - Monsieur Christian Baudu, de l’agence
  • suivi scientifique DRAC Bretagne – Service régional de l’archéologie Stéphane DESCHAMPS (conservateur régional de l’archéologie), Yves MENEZ (adjoint du conservateur régional), Christian CRIBELLIER (conservateur du patrimoine en charge du département du Morbihan au moment de la
  • Lucie JEANNERET - plan topographique Bruno RÉGENT, Alain TRISTE, Aurélien FORTUNE, Laurent FOURNIER, Elora FOURNIER, Christian HOUZE, Maryvonne REYNTJES, Maurice CHEVEAU, Hélène FOURNEL, Monique THUREAU, Marie-Laure BRUNIE, Marc PISIGO, Clément LE GEDARD, André COCHELIN, Fabienne
  • COCHELIN, Dany NUE, Mickael HAMON, Thibaut PERES, Marion GORBEA, Jean-Claude SICARD Équipe de post-fouille Gestion du mobilier : Isabelle BRUNIE Nettoyage, tri et inventaire : Isabelle BRUNIE, Germaine TOULLIOU, Yves BERTHELOT, Bruno RÉGENT, Maurice CHEVEAU, Yann DUFAY-GAREL, Christian
RAP03801 (Corpus des signes gravés néolithiques, Art rupestre néolithique en Armorique. Rapport PCR.)
  • , Valentin Grimaud et Malou Blank-Bäckelund, Christine Boujot, Olivier Celo, Cyrille Chaigneau, Emmanuelle Collado, Mikaël Guiavarc’h, Philip de Jersey, Christian Obeltz , Guirec Querré, Bettina Schulz-Paulsson, Dominique Sellier, Alia Vázquez Martínez, Emmanuelle Vigier, Marie Vourc'h
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • ; in addition, environmental analysis and a survey of standing buildings is being undertaken. The larger study involves (amongst other éléments) analysis of documents, including the very detailed cadastral maps and records of the early nineteenth century (Asti 1 1 and Davies 1982a, 1982b
  • that are mapped, far less than in 1984, while a further 39% were up to 500m, and 25.6% more than 500m, away; it was largely sites in F that caused this anomaly. Comparison was systematical ly made with the early nineteenth-century pattern of land-use and settlement, as evidenced by the ancien
  • cadastre, as usual. More than three-quarters of the concentrations (80.2%) lay more than 100m away from early nineteenth-century settlements and only 7.5% lay within 50m of them. (This is not signif icantly différent from distances from modem settlements). Surface material tends
  • to be found within areas of nineteenth-century arable, as always - especially in bandes (literally 'bands 1 , arable divided into tenant parcels) - and the proportion was comparable with that of 1984 (70.1% of concentrations in 1985, as compared with 66.7%). The remainder occurred
  • in nineteenth-century meadow and/or pasture (3.8%), marginal 1 ande (unculti vated land, not fallow - a high 8.6%), woodl and (0.5%), curtilage and areas of mixed land-use; ail but the latter suggest some measurable change in land-use by indicating pre-nineteenth-century arable or settlement
  • and in the early 'nineteenth century (Astill and Davies 1982b: 21f, 31). Thèse cadastral suggestions coincided with fields that produced concentrations of surface material at the post-medieval 'site' C470 and, more arguably, the post-medieval 'probable site 1 C473, although no buildings were
  • indicated there in the nineteenth century. One concentration was located in an area which had standing, inhabited, buildings in the early nineteenth century, but which is now devoid of structures or earthworks: F212, a 'possible site' (médiéval and post-medieval ) . Overall
  • or schi ste; the imported material is notably absent from fields cleared of woodl and since the 1 ate nineteenth century. Fieldwalking in 5m squares ('Total' Coll ecti on ) In order to investigate the nature of sites identified in transect walking, as in 1983 and 1984 some fields
  • contour in a flat area. In the early nineteenth century it 1 ay on a track and was part of a block of arable in the ' château landscape' associated with La Meule, 125m to the west (a landscape where seigneurial 1 and management introduced distinctive rectangular field shapes, greater
  • ) and 6.36 fragments of brick and tile (115.57g). The assemblage included second-century central Gaulish Samian and rims of third/fourth-century types; thirty-eight pièces of tegul a and twenty-nine of imbrex; three pièces of haematite (310g) and two worked flints. Magnetic susceptibil
  • in an area that was extensive 1 ande in the early nineteenth century. Previously, there was little to suggest that it was cultivated before the twentieth century and it is clearly in a zone that was marginal for most of the historic period: the nearest settlement (La Bridelaie) is 500m
  • . The results confirm the impression that this 1 and was not brought into cultivation until the twentieth century, and confirm the classification made on the basis of transect walking - the field real ly is 1 bl ank 1 . B347 lies on a slight east-facing slope at 35m, beside a stream, and its
  • size is 0.44 hectare. In the early nineteenth century it was part of an area of water meadow, 250m from the nearest settlement of Le Cleu. 0.3 Roman sherds per square were collected (2.11g), with 0.4 médiéval sherds (1.63g), 0.31 post-medieval sherds (1.71g) and 2.38 fragments
  • of brick and tile (50.82g). The assemblage included second-century Roman wares, fifteen fragments of tegul a and one of imbrex. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery were gênerai 1 y distributed over the field but both Roman pottery and brick and tile cl ustered in the north-eastern third
  • lynchet some 1.8m high. This area is near the northern periphery of the Ruffiac commune, and the ancien cadastre indicates that it was a zone of extensive 1 ande in the early nineteenth century. Set within the 1 ande was the petit château of Coetion, with its metai ries (associated
  • of arable characteristic of the ' château landscape". Since the château appears to have been built by the seventeenth century, and the associated landscaping at least considerably pre-dates the nineteenth century, the settlement at Allô was presumably abandoned before seigneurial
  • interests put their mark on this landscape. The bank, which lies in an area of nineteenth-century meadow and is not shown on the ancien cadastre, may therefore relate to earlier land-use; the lynchet lies at the edge of the château arable, about which - at least - it should furnish some
  • characteristic of the région in the sixteenth to early eighteenth centuries was notable: only 3% of post-medieval pottery was recovered, and that mostly modem. There was no apparent zoning of particular fabrics, which would suggest a constant accumulation of soil produced by near continuous
  • . It produced only seven pièces of brick and tile and 47 sherds of pottery. Most of the pottery was of fabric 1 (44.7%); there was also a notable proportion of the médiéval tableware, fabrics 5 (12.5%) and 6 (21.3%). The post-medieval wares were mainly nineteenth-century types (8.5
  • commune was intensively cultivated from the 1 ater twelfth century (although small amounts of earlier pottery could reflect earlier activity), while the absence of early post-medieval wares suggests a lapse in arable cultivation during the early modem period or changes in manuring
RAP03313.pdf (VENDEL (35). De l'Antiquité au Moyen Âge, approches archéogéographiques et historiques)
  • planification volontaire (centuriation romaine ou lotissements médiévaux) étaient recherchées
  • première fois en s’appuyant notamment sur des travaux entre Vendel et La Selle-en-Luitré40. Ils supposaient que l’une d’elles reliait Rennes à Jublains. Christian Le Bouteiller a également beaucoup travaillé sur les réseaux viaires, mais son travail n’a pas la même pertinence que celui
RAP03220.pdf (PLOUHARNEL, CARNAC (56). Goah Lêron : les monolithes enfouis de Goah Lêron et du Pusso. Rapport de diagnostic)
  •  prospections de  Christian  Obelz,  mais  aussi  d’un  dispositif  lié  à  la  butte  naturelle  surplombant  le  ruisseau  au  nord‐est  de  l’emprise.  Des monolithes ont également été réemployés dans le mur de pierres sèches appuyé contre le grand talus  parcellaire traversant l’emprise
  •  Pusso au nord), plus ou moins déstructurées ont été signalées anciennement  (Gaillard, 1897) et plus récemment (prospections Christian Obelz, 2007).   La ligne électrique aérienne traverse ces files de pierres. Le fuseau du projet d’enfouissement suivant la ligne  actuelle,  le
  • ‐ci  et  l’ensemble  de  Lann  Granvillarec  à  Carnac  (également  documenté par Christian Obelz, et dont un tertre a fait l’objet d’opérations préventives récemment : Agogué et  al. 2013 ; Fromont et al. 2015) puis les alignements bien connus de Carnac.  Cet  ensemble  se  place
  •  par le passage d’un chemin (Fig. 6).  Christian  Obelz  a  retrouvé  les  restes  de  cette  enceinte  déjà  dégradée,  qu’il  a  dessinée  avant  et  après  le  remembrement (Fig.  7)  :  si  elle  était  encore  partiellement  en  place  avant,  elle  a  été  détruite  par  celui
  •  » dans le contexte mégalithique des principaux dispositifs de pierres dressées du sud  Morbihan (DAO A. Suaud‐Préault)    28    II‐Résultats    Figure 5: localisation des monolithes repérés par Christian Obelz, des blocs mis en évidence par le diagnostic et emprise de celui‐ci
  •  par F. Gaillard (en haut ‐ in Gaillard, 1897) et par Murray (en bas ‐ in Blair and  Ronalds 1836).       Figure 7 : vestiges de l’enceinte mégalithique du Cosquer avant et après remembrement. Schémas Christian Obelz  30      II‐Résultats    1.3. Stratégie et méthodes mises
  • ‐ouest du ruisseau, dans la continuité de la file du  Pusso, était signalé par les prospections  de Christian Obelz. Les autres étaient soit enfouis soit masqués par la  végétation. Ils sont décrits ci‐après selon leur situation. Les grands blocs enfouis et dégagés lors du diagnostic
RAP02332.pdf (PAIMPONT (35). le Bois Jacob. rapport de fouille programmée annuelle)
  • Jacques GUILLEMOT Anne-Cécile HERVE Guy LARCHER Marie-José LE GARREC Rozenn LE MOEL Fabien LESGUER Elise MERDY Emilie NOIN Jean-Charles OILLIC Christian RAGUIN Laura TORRES Merci en particulier à Guy LARCHER, Jean BOUCARD et Marie-José LE GARREC pour leur investissement permanent et
  • : without alkali T h e m a t e r i a l was first tested for friability ("softness"). Very soft bone material is an indication of the potential a b s e n c e of the collagen fraction (basal b o n e protein acting as a "reinforcing agent" within the crystalline apatite structure). It w a s
  • o u t alkali" refers to the N a O H step b e i n g skipped d u e to p o o r preservation conditions, which could result in r e m o v a l of all available organics if p e r f o r m e d . Typically applied to: b o n e s "acid etch" he c a l c a r e o u s material w a s first w a s