Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Type d'opération
Date (Année)

209 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • to have been a Spanish amphora; the upper fill (58) produced no finds. The eastern edge of the ditch had been eut into by a group of four pits. Pit 77 was dug first, and then three more -71, 73 and 75: none of the fills produced finds (76, 70, 72, 74). A mètre down slope
  • five-day planning trips by two in September 1987 and April 1988. The team, consisting of volunteers from a wide range of places, numbered twenty-six, including the directors, one finds assistant and three supervisors; it worked for f i ve weeks from 28 August, with four days off
  • , and the majority (577.) of the post-medi eval wares was ni neteenth-century . Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile were recovered but only from the first three spits (total 23 fragments, 0. 787kg) . Context 1, however, had in addition to local quartz and quartzite large quantities (120kg
  • charcoal (16) and smail 1 fragments of mudstone; this produced two smal 1 and abraded sherds of Iron-Age pottery (Fabric 86); the upper fill (15) had no finds. Another pit was also found in the north section (22: lm wide, 0.42m deep) whose fill (23) had no finds but more mudstone
  • fragments. Mear the east section was an oval pit (25: lm x 0.75m and 0.28m deep); the fill again produced no finds (27). Another pit in section (26: fill 28, no finds) had been eut into by a smal 1er pit (7: fill 8). Three intercutting pits were excavated in the centre of the trench
  • , fill 20). None of thèse pits produced finds. The layer into which thèse pits had been eut was a yellowish clay with charcoal flecks and it overlay a degraded quartzitic Ordovician mudstone (31: 05a/05-6) . The surface of this layer sloped in the opposite direction to that of context
  • . The range o-f pottery recovered -from the top two spits was very différent -from the lowest spit. In the first twenty centimètres 45 sherds were -found; médiéval pottery predominated (837.), -followed by post-medi eval (157.) and a single sherd o-f Roman pottery (27.) ; 52 -fragments o-f
  • , loosely compacted quart:-: pebble conglomerate and riverine gravel . The lower fill (17) had more stone (47.7kg) than the upper (16: 19.6kg): the différence may reflect two separate dumps of soil; the cleanness of the fillings, the comparât i vel y small number of finds and the lack
  • probabil ity the same one, at the north end of both trenches. The ditch (27 in T43, 35 in T44) was 0.7m wide and 0.3m deep and was fill ed with a silty clay which produced no finds (28 in T43, 33 and 34 in T44) . This ditch appear s to have been a drainage ditch for the track which
  • to that of 10. The finds, though more plentiful, were similar in range: 14 sherds of grey coarse ware jars, 4 sherds of ter ra-ni qra -type pottery, 6 sherds of Iron-Age fabric and two pièces of ceramic tile were found. There was another ditch (11) in the south of the trench, eut
  • into natural. The edges were not as clearly defined as ditch 5, and the profile was more irregular; a 2m length was excavated, which was 0.6m deep and 1.2m wide. Although it was parallel with 5, its filling (12) was much sandier and the range of finds was différent. Large quanti ties
  • was built and may have been made redundant by its construction - hence the fills. Although, then, excavation of A92 was very limited, it cl earl y demonstrates that. there was a Roman-period building on or near the ridge, which was occupied in the first and second centuries
  • and A79 were first walked at 50m intervais in 1982; the material which was recovered concentrated where the two fields joined and was classified as a 'probable médiéval site'; Roman pottery was also noted. The field boundaries were subséquent 1 y changed and the eastern part of A31 has
  • southerly, 0.S lm wide and 0.4m deep (51: filled with 50), appears to have been reçut, for a smaller ditch (80: fill 81) 0.5m wide and 0.15m deep had removed the eastern side of ditch 51. Neither ditch produced finds. Ditch 53 was wider (1.2m) and deeper (0.5m) and its fill (52) contai
  • at the bottom of the valley slope. The part of T39 which was on the ridge produced one shallow feature only, perhaps the base of a pit (65: 0.6m wide, 0.1m deep), whose fill (9) produced no finds. Between the brow of the ridge and upper part of the slope (between 30 and 60m from the south
  • dug parallel, 6.4m apart. Ditch 19, 1.75m wide and 0.6 m deep, had within its fill (20) two sherd s of late Iron- Age/ear 1 y Roman pottery (Fabric 13) and 6 small pièces of iron— working slag. The more northerly ditch, 2:4, had a primary silt (60) with no finds and then a loam
  • and reached a maximum depth of 0.35m: this point corresponded with the break in slope. No finds were recovered from layer 4. The only other feature located in T39 was 18m from the north end of the trench and was a shal 1 ow-si ded 'ditch' 0.15m deep (5). It had an irregular profile
  • and was différent from the other ditches located on the site; its fill (11) yielded no finds. This may represent another récent attempt at drainage. The trench al so eut through the earthwork which was located at the bottom of the slope; no additional layers were found and it seemed
  • intercutting pits. Pit 32 (0.62m in diameter, 0.15m deep) had been the first to be eut and bac kfi lied (31); it contained 1 sherd of late Iron-Age/earl y Roman pottery. Two pits were then dug partly into 32 and 31 and partly into the natural. Both were about 0.5m in diameter and 0.1m deep
  • (30 and 57); they did not eut each other. The fill (56) of pit 57 had 1 sherd of a Roman grey coarseware (Fabric 216); that. of pit 30 (29) produced no finds. There? were no features in the trench for a long section of the slope, some 26m, and then there was a further group of pits
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • concentrations of material not covered by the above catégories for example, one unit with five or more sherds of the same period •- have been termed 'possible sites'. (The minimum number of finds necessary to quai if y a concentration for comment has been del i beratel y fixed at a 1 ow level
  • and also zones that tend to produce more or less of a surface scatter» Surface material is usually markedly absent from areas near the commune boundaries and is also difficult to find in the fields to the north of Qui 1 vain and around Le? Bois Faux; si gni f i cant 1 y , the more
  • . The first (T7) ran north west from T3 across a slight break in si ope, and the other two (T5 and T6) were eut in order to section the platform near T4 (see fig. C) . The-? sections were cleaned and drawn and features in the bottom of the trenches recorded. The two 6m squares were mai ni
  • y excavated by hand. The plough soi 1 was removed in 10-20cm spits by shovel s the spoi 1 was searched for finds (including schi ste) on the si de of the excavation. As a control a randomly chosen 60cm square (57. of the main cutting), was removed separately and wet sieved
  • through an 8mm mesh. The density of finds in this plough soil was low, as the following table shows s depth no. of finds recovered by hand no. of finds in control T3 surface (fieldwalking) 0—10 cm 10-20 cm 20—30 cm T4 surface (fieldwalking) 0-20 cm 20-40 cm 40-60 cm 60-70 cm 1 6 9
  • with plough soil. A small négative feature, 20cm wide, was also noted in section. Neither feature produced finds. The pottery from the plough soil of bot h T3 and T7 was entirely médiéval, and of a similar character to that recovered from the surface, that is 907. coarse wares of fabric 1
  • and were 14cm and 20cm (contexte 4 and 5 respecti vel y ) deeps eamples for pollen and soil analysis were taken from context 5» No finds were recovered from the features, but four sherds of pottery came from the surface of the ditch fillings, whose ■fabrics were différent from those
  • by the early post médiéval period (Asti 11 and Davies 1985s 92-5, 97)» If the occupation in T4 is prehistoric then it is the first of its kind for the? région and has important implications for survey work» Its low-lying position, in a wet valley bottom and sealed by 70cm of colluvium
  • produced no finds. However seven abraded body sherds of Iron Age pottery were recovered from the surface of the .natural . Trench 24 of the plough soil ranged from T24 was 81m long, and the depth the si ope. The clay 15cm at. the top to 1.0m at the bottom of ow the plough soil
  • -f an enclosure, but the -failure to -find a turn would argue against this, and may suggest that it was eut merely to drain the land. The mixed date range o-f the pottery ■from this ditch makes it impossible to suggest a firm date for i t. The évidence for a holloway, replaced
  • ; field names (landes and f ri ches) over the whole area indicate that it had not been characteri st i cal 1 y cultivated before the 1820s. The field was first wal ked in 1984 and was classified as a 'possible site' (médiéval). In April 1986 it was intensively wal ked and this produced
  • the first trench was placed over one of the 'concentrations' of Iron Age pottery. Initial ly ai 6m square (T15) was excavated as at Al 16, A92 and H145, and then five trenches (1 mètre wide) were eut north-south across the field at 30m intervais using a machine (from west to east. T16/17
  • produced the greatest amount of prehistoric material from the whole site. The 1 owest fill (45) produced 11 pièces of tile (0.365kg) and 8 sherds of Iron Age pottery (0„120g). Layer 57 overlay 45 and produced no finds. 22 overlay this and contained 60 pièces of daub (0.168kg) , 30
  • a small ditch (10) had been dug through a pit, approx i matel y 34cm in diameter and 60cm deep- It had filled u.p with clay, probably as a resuit of silting (53), but at the bottom there was layer of ash and charcoal mixed with burnt clay (54). It produced no finds, but a comparable
  • (277.), greywacke (147.) and quartz (107.). The stone may have been used when the pit was used for firing, piled on to the south si de, and then pushed back. No finds were recovered from this feature. Half a mètre to the north a pit containing burnt clay fragments was excavated (18
  • . 40 . 68 . 75 T18/10 T 18/1 1 47 37 . 60 .54 T19/16 T 19/20 60 58 30 . 46 . 51 .51 T20/33 T20/34 T20/35 T20/50 T20/51 T20/40 .1. 45 76 04 44 36 30 „ 60 .71 .51 T 17/26 T 17/25 T 17/52 T 17/27 T17/29 . 45 .70 Width of Finds & bottom illustrations .20 17 IA(H80,8),4 tile
  • between one rira found at HSO and one from A92 (see fig» 6, HBO-5 and A92-2) would perhaps argue for a date that spans the first centuries BC and AD» The 'Roman' character of the assemblage might also be suggested by the substantiel tiles for, although not very wel 1 fired
RAP01768.pdf (le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • where such schi stes do not occur at ail; and that there are distinctions between the occurrence of black and pink 'roofing' schi stes. In ail three transects it is very unusual to find fields with pink but not black schi stes and the rare occurrence of thèse does not look
  • there are finds from the Rance/ Vi 1 ai ne river Systems and one sherd from Pipriac is already known (Galliou 1977: 91-2). The médiéval fabrics from this eastern région seem to have less mica, fewer spi cul es and more grog. Some of the fields with Roman material are of particular interest
  • by smelting iron ore in shaf t f urnaces; that from R9, however, weighed 2kg and came from the bottoms of bowl furnaces; first- and second-century pottery was collected from the surface in this 6 area. This season 's work has produced several indications that the core communes
RAP02188.pdf (CARHAIX-PLOUGUER (29). rue Ernest Renan (parcelles ac. 369). dfs de diagnostic)
  • Préfète de la région Bretagne, préfète d'Ille et Vilaine Le Directeur régional dg&ajgaires culturelles Steppe e s c ha^ps ^ ^ + I N S T I T U T N A T I O N A L d E R E C H E R C H E S A R C H É O L O G I Q U E S P R E V E N T I V E S + FICHE DE PROJET DE
RAP01324.pdf (CORSEUL (22). Monterfil II. rapport de fouille programmée)
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • , have been termed 'probable sites'; fields in which there were irregular concentrations of material not covered by the above catégories - for example, one unit with five or more sherds of the same period - have been termed 'possible sites'. (The minimum number of finds necessary
  • and post-medieval pottery; 0221 had been classified as a 'possible site', with a prépondérance of médiéval pottery in an assemblage that included Roman wares; B216 was a 'blank' field which had produced no finds; B347 was classified as a 'site 1 , with Roman pottery predominating. Soil
  • /grey and red/yellow) and three sizes (1.5cm) in an attempt to find criteria for distinguishing between local and imported material. A107 lies just below a flat, exposed hilltop on a south-facing slope 75-80m high. The area was arable when the cadastral survey
  • to facilitate excavation and recording. Soil was excavated using trowels and ail the finds, with the exception of schiste, were three-dimensional ly recorded. Because of the quantities recovered and the lack of time, the schi ste was collected in 5cm spits. The bad weather prevented total
  • - large quantities indicate 1 ate médiéval and/or early modem (twelfthto seventeenth- century) activity. Indeed, further, surface finds suggest that settlements throughout the modem period may have generated less than 50m of scatter: in L90 finds occurred within 20m of the buildings
RAP02769.pdf (ÎLE-DE-MOLÈNE (29). programme archéologique molenais, rapport n°17, beg ar loued : un habitat en pierres s7ches du campaniforme/âge du bronze ancien. rapport de fouille programmée 2011)
RAP03345.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil : Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP)
RAP03817 (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat de chasseurs-cueilleurs maritimes de l'Holocène. Rapport de FP 2019)
RAP01710.pdf ((56). la ria d'Étel. rapport de prospection inventaire)
RAP03316.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). Ménez-Dregan 1 : des Prénéandertaliens aux Néandertaliens à l'extrême ouest de l'Europe. Rapport de FP)
RAP00157.pdf (BERNÉ (56). forêt domaniale de Pont-Calleck. rapport de sauvetage urgent.)
  • Indo-européens. Le Ruckstrom. Les civilisations de la steppe. 2. - ECLOSIONS MEDITERRANEENNES. Malte. Les hypogées d'Arles. Les comptoirs êgéens en Occident. Le Bronze Ancien en Andalousie : El Argar. 3. - LE LEVAIN D'UNETICE. Les porteurs de torques. La métallurgie : naissance et
RAP02402.pdf (MOLÈNE (29). beg ar loued : un habitat en pierres sèches campaniforme. rapport intermédiaire 2008 de fp 2007-2009)
RAP02738.pdf (thorigne fouillard (35). ZAC de la Vigne-tranche 2. rapport de fouille préventive)
  • which had been occupied in the course of the first half of the 13th century. It appears to have been established on virgin territory sometime between the end of the 12th century and the beginning of the 13th century and was contemporaneous with the foundation of a priory and new
  • or acting as a hayloft) and which were probably related to a predominantly pastoral economy. However, the site lacks a substantial architectural structure that would act as a large storage building for such a self-sufficient community. Furthermore, the extreme poverty of ceramic finds
  • as well as the absence of metallic finds or animal bones therefore make it difficult to confirm or interpret the nature of the economy of the settlement. Ultimately, the site was abandoned after half a century of occupation perhaps due to a conflagration (evidence of which was found
  • or a migration of the inhabitants to another site nearby, an interpretation validated by the presence of ceramic finds dating to the 14th century and by the place name by which it is known, 'La Clotière'. It would suggest that the reorganization and division of both land and population