Rechercher sur le site

  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot OU un autre : tapez simplement les mots à la suite => bracelet bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant un mot ET un autre : utilisez le mot-clef AND => bracelet AND bronze
  • Chercher les documents contenant une expression exacte : taper l'expression entre guillemets => "bracelet en bronze"

Limiter votre recherche

Type d'opération
Date (Année)

1865 résultats Exporter les résultats

Trier par Titre : ascendant / descendant
RAP00565.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • , but sixteen worked flints were recovered, three from transect L, three from C and ten from F, and also a stone axe, the stone of which has yet to be identified (F117). Two possible areas of ridge and furrow were noted, along with fourteen lynchets and eight (mostly substantial) old banks
  • fragments of brick and tile (6.58g). The assemblage included five worked flints, one pièce of haematite and two pièces of tegul a. Although black/grey and grey/green schiste were présent ail over the field, and looked like natural , red/yellow schi ste was distributed in a pattern
  • ) and 6.36 fragments of brick and tile (115.57g). The assemblage included second-century central Gaulish Samian and rims of third/fourth-century types; thirty-eight pièces of tegul a and twenty-nine of imbrex; three pièces of haematite (310g) and two worked flints. Magnetic susceptibil
  • collection; phosphate analysis and soil magnetic susceptibil ity survey of the four selected areas; and excavation of part of a bank and lynchet near a field from which 'total' collection had previously been made. Three days (21-23 March) were spent in préparation by three people
  • ; the main team (consisting largely of past and présent students from the Universities of London and Reading) numbered twenty-two, including the directors; it worked for twel ve days, from 24 March, and had one day off; nine people (including one director) remained for an additional week
  • covered, encompassing 772 hectares (4.01% of the surface area of the four communes). 30.99kg of pottery and 93.92kg of man-made building material were recovered from the transects; 45% of the pottery was médiéval, 53.6% post-medieval and 1.4% Roman. No pre-Roman pottery was found
  • cadastre, as usual. More than three-quarters of the concentrations (80.2%) lay more than 100m away from early nineteenth-century settlements and only 7.5% lay within 50m of them. (This is not signif icantly différent from distances from modem settlements). Surface material tends
  • in the Coet Morel /Hôtel Orl and area (Carentoir). Surface material is markedly absent from fields on the northern and southern boundaries of L, on the east/west ridges (particularly on a band north west of Carentoir) and - as might be expected - on most steep slopes. There are again
  • or schi ste; the imported material is notably absent from fields cleared of woodl and since the 1 ate nineteenth century. Fieldwalking in 5m squares ('Total' Coll ecti on ) In order to investigate the nature of sites identified in transect walking, as in 1983 and 1984 some fields
  • and post-medieval pottery; 0221 had been classified as a 'possible site', with a prépondérance of médiéval pottery in an assemblage that included Roman wares; B216 was a 'blank' field which had produced no finds; B347 was classified as a 'site 1 , with Roman pottery predominating. Soil
  • samples for future phosphate analysis were taken from the topsoil in ail squares, at 5m intervais, and soil magnetic suscepti bi 1 i ty readings were also taken at 5m intervais, at the spot from which samples had been lifted. Fluxgate gradiometer readings were not taken since 1984
  • tests suggested that thèse were only useful if taken at much narrower intervais. Schiste was collected, totally from A107, D221 and B216, and in a limited sample from B347 (from one square in every nine). This was subsequently classified in three colour catégories (black/grey, green
  • was recorded, the field being the same size and shape as at présent but divided into bandes; an area of 1 ande lay to the north and the nearest settlement (La Boulardaie) lay 130m away. Pottery, building material and schi ste were collected from an area of 1 hectare, distributed ail over
  • unusually large, and their distribution, together with the nature of the assemblage, suggests that the field once contained a Roman-period structure. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery, by contrast, probably arrived as a resuit of manuring. B216 lies on a slight north-west si ope at 65m
  • size is 0.44 hectare. In the early nineteenth century it was part of an area of water meadow, 250m from the nearest settlement of Le Cleu. 0.3 Roman sherds per square were collected (2.11g), with 0.4 médiéval sherds (1.63g), 0.31 post-medieval sherds (1.71g) and 2.38 fragments
  • of brick and tile (50.82g). The assemblage included second-century Roman wares, fifteen fragments of tegul a and one of imbrex. Médiéval and post-medieval pottery were gênerai 1 y distributed over the field but both Roman pottery and brick and tile cl ustered in the north-eastern third
  • . As with field 0221, this cl ustering was sufficiently pronounced (and sufficiently distinct from the distribution of médiéval and post-medieval pottery) to suggest that a Roman-period structure once stood on the field. Magnetic susceptibil ity readings produced unusually high values
  • to the bedrock. Quantities of natural schi ste from this field were enormous, some squares producing 45kg; the sampling strategy proved to be of very limited value since it was impossible to gain a sensé of overall distribution and difficult to correl ate the collected squares with the cl
  • of the 18 mètre squares) was dug. Soil samples for micromorphol ogical and pollen analysis were taken in columns from the sections, using purpose-made meta! containers. Small test holes were also eut by machine at every 15m to the north of Trench 1 (up the side of the south-facing valley
  • the same alignaient as the lynchet. The ditch was fi 1 1 ed with a homogeneous silty loam which contained two sherds of médiéval pottery and two pièces of (? médiéval) tile. The fill of the ditch was indistinguishable from the overlying thick 1 ayer of loam, which constituted the main
RAP01557.pdf (PLOULEC'H (22). le Yaudet. rapport final de synthèse de fouille programmée 1996-1998)
  • impossible que la plate-fonne décrite ci-dessus (Us 363) ait servi à consolider le sol avant l'érection d'une telle structure, mais nous ne pouvons pour l'instant le prouver avec certitude. Le rempart 2 est formé d'une masse considérable de pierres (Us 361) adossée à un parement externe
RAP00566.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • worked flints were also collected, three from transect E, three from B, two from B and one from D. One possible platform and thirty lynchets were noted, of which fifteen were in Transect D. As in previous years there were considérable variations in the concentration of recovered
  • T15 and T16 clearly do so. Although there is no défi ni te structural évidence, the assemblage coming from the pit group 7 can only be interpreted as settlement débris. The pottery forms suggest a very late Iron Age, or very early Roman , date» The similarity in form and fabric
  • between one rira found at HSO and one from A92 (see fig» 6, HBO-5 and A92-2) would perhaps argue for a date that spans the first centuries BC and AD» The 'Roman' character of the assemblage might also be suggested by the substantiel tiles for, although not very wel 1 fired
  • of fieldwork, itself part of a larger, mul t i -di sci pl i nary study of the relationship between and settlement during the last two thousand years, took place from 21 March - 5 April and 6 -- 27 September in the communes of Ruffiac, Treal, St~Ni col as-du-Tertre , Carentoir, La
  • involved fieldwalking over large areas at wide intervais, as in 1982 85, in the four core communes; sampling in the communes surrounding the core? and excavation of parts of a field from which 'total' collection had previously been made. Two days (21-22 March) were spent in préparation
  • for the main season by two people. The team (consisting largely of past and présent students from the Universities of London, Reading, Durham and Sheffield) numbered twenty, including the directors, and worked for twelve days, from 23 March, with one day off. A smal 1 team, of the directors
  • and also zones that tend to produce more or less of a surface scatter» Surface material is usually markedly absent from areas near the commune boundaries and is also difficult to find in the fields to the north of Qui 1 vain and around Le? Bois Faux; si gni f i cant 1 y , the more
  • of Transect G, from Métairie au Joly to Le Nouai-)» The figures quoted above demonstrate the remarkably high proportion of fields in G with large concentrations of surface material. The présence of tile scatters, sometimes with smal 1 quanti ties of Roman material associated, were notable
  • possible to see zoning in the présence of thèse schi stes» hence, only black schi stes occurred throughout the ^Ruffiac basin (from Lodineu to Ville Robert and south to La Rivière) and also in a large zone in the north of Transects D and E (from Trelo to La Touche du Mur); in strong
  • contrast black and pink/purple roofing fragments occurred together in zones immediately north of the Ruffiac basin and west of the Trelo zone. It was also possible, in some cases, to distinguish a range of other schi stes that were imported from nearby local sources, probably as walling
  • the ancien cadastre , as usua 1 . More than three-quarters of concentrations of pottery (76.7V.) 1 ay more than 100m away from early n i net eenth-century settlements and only 12» 5% 1 ay within 50m of them» (The former is only slightly higher than distances from modem settlements
  • of the? sites 1 ay within 250m of mapped streams (427.) , while more than a quarter (31.57.) were more than 500m away from them. £< . Samplinq ou.tside the core transects Sampling outside the core was organisée) in 2km radiating from it and thèse were walked in the s ame way as in one
  • , transects within the core. Ail available fields Transect for we>re covered; tl 11s ran 10km slightly west of N of from the north-west Ruffiac, and passed north , boundary communes of Carc , Reminiac and Augan the and into the through south oi Zampefrieac, running just to the w est
  • and their property less dispersed, with more cattle and altogether a more wealthy air; and, despite récent in the core. remembrement , fewer remembrement mounds than Transect M, running slightly south 01 east from the south~-e?ast corner of Carentoir, was bequn, but most of it remains 209 fields
  • were walked (of which to be covered (see fig. B) » hectares (18% of the surface area 6 were in M), encompassing 257 of Transect N) . 7.86kg of pottery and 13.81kg of man-made building material were recovered from thèse transects; 1.37. of the pottery was pre-Roman „ 1% Roman, 29.7
  • % médiéval and 68% post-medi eval 5 six worked flints were? collected. One possible platform, a mound and ten lynchets were also noted. In accordance with the usual conventions, concentrations of surface material (total 51) may b e c 1 a s s i f i e d as f o 1 1 o w s r, Si tes ' ' Pr
  • management the proportion of sites located and quanti ti es of material collected is entirely comparable with those in the four core communes. However , there is less médiéval material than has usual 1 y been found there and it was a considérable contrast to collect pre-Roman sherds from
  • the surface. However, the distribution pattern of material does not si gni f i cant 1 y deviate from that found in the core. There are again areas with little or no material 'blank ' zones - and areas with more or less of a surface scatter. So, material tends to concentrate in the La
  • Bonneraye/Le Printemps/Saint-Nicolas (Reminiac) area and in the area around ^the château of Touraille, stretching north from it over the? Campeneac commune boundary to La Tieulais; and there are a di sti net i ve number of 1 ow concentrations of post-medi eval material in the Les PI aci
  • eux to Ville Glâird area. There are large 'blank' zones from La Ravraie to Le Boulay and also north west of Augan, although such zones are not so character i st i c of the commune boundaries as they are in the core communes. Se h i stes in gênerai re-f lect the pinker colour
RAP00567.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • of pottery, 161.72kg of man-made building material, 23 from thèse flints and 611.72g of haematite were recovered transects , together with two worked pièces of quartz (from M). This breaks down, by transect, as follows: Brick/tile kg 18. 49 P M 121 . 77 21 . 46 R Pre-Rom. Pottery 1 . 47
  • years, took place from 20 March - 4 April in the communes surrounding Ruffiac, Treal , St-Ni col as-du-Tertre and Carentoir, in the departments of Morbihan and 1 1 1 e-et-Vi 1 ai ne in eastern Brittany. The aim of the study is to détermine when, how and why the exploitation
  • landscape
  • , Reading, Cardiff and York) numbered twenty-two, ' including the directors, and worked for twel ve deiys, from 22 March, with one day off. Six people went in advance, and worked for one day beforehand. Overall, 330 mandays were spent on this year ' s season, including travelling time
  • ) Sampling was organized in three 2km transects radiating from the core (P, M and R) and thèse were wal ked in the same way as Transects A to L within the core and Transect N outside it, in 1982-6. Transect P ran due west to the River Oust for 4.1km from the western boundary of Ruffiac
  • (from the area of La Sourigaie to La Houssaie), passing through the communes of Missiriac and Malestroit and the northern outskirts of the town of Malestroit; Transect R ran north east for 7.75km from Trelo to Le Mur at the north-east corner of Carentoir, passing through the communes
  • of surface scatters Di scussi on Clearly the character of the surface material differs from transect to transect. Transects P and M had areas which produced a little pre-Roman pottery - as had Transect N - a phenomenon that is extremely rare in the core communes (Asti 11 and Davies 1986
  • for its very 1 ow proportions of médiéval pottery and very high of post-medi eval . Thèse results are striking by comparison with patterns of material recovered from the four core communes. Whereas the amounts of Roman material collected from the surface are mue h the same, the amounts
  • and proportions of médiéval material are 1 ower (especially in R) - as in N - while those of post-medi eval material are considerably higher, though not as high as in N; in the core 507. of pottery collected from the surface was médiéval and 46.77. post-medi eval . The proportion
  • . Thereafter, although there are a few 'blank' fields in the nei ghbourhood of Pipriac it is again marked that there are very few from Pipriac east to the Vilaine. The contrast between this area and that to the west of it is very striking. The distribution of material in relation
  • to existing settlements was much the same as found in the core communes, with slightly fewer concentrations at distances above 300m from modem dwellings. In ail cases material tends to occur within 50 and 300m of settlements - in P, for example, 33.37. of concentrations lie within 100
  • used locally for building, especially roofing, materials was also recorded for each field (though not collected). Thèse materials were not carried for long distances (10—20km maximum) but can usually be clearly di st i ngui shed from local natural , and o-f ten have nail holes
  • on the north-east side of the high land near the Carentoi r /Combl essac boundary and none by the wood in the Lande de Craon, both areas lacking surface pottery too. There was little or no pink material on the western and south-western si des of this high land, and none from Couè'dillan
  • north east to Comblessac, as also north from Comblessac to the Lande de Craon. The pattern of occurrences of the schi stes in thèse transects suggests that the pink schi stes . i.e. material from the Guer quarries, may wel 1 have been the earliest to be used in the roofing industry
  • and the western section of M). Some of the Roman fabrics in eastern ti had not been noted before, and included a late Roman roi 1 er-st amped sherd of Argonne ware from M447, near 'Château Gaillard', 2.5km east of Pipriac bourg ■ This ware has an essentially coastal distribution, although
  • there are finds from the Rance/ Vi 1 ai ne river Systems and one sherd from Pipriac is already known (Galliou 1977: 91-2). The médiéval fabrics from this eastern région seem to have less mica, fewer spi cul es and more grog. Some of the fields with Roman material are of particular interest
  • was found near Le Boschet, Château de la Boulaye, 'Château Gaillard' (ail in M) and near le Mur (R) . There are, however, two cases of such material being found near (apparently) non-seigneurial settlements 300m from Comblessac in R and 100m from La Rigaudiere, 1km south of Pipriac, in M
  • where a 'temple' is sited (R8) , was observed to have a ploughed-out stone building, apparently unrecorded and suggesting a larger complex of buildings than has previously been supposée) Gai 1 i a 1977). Slag was collected from both R8 and R9; that from RS is tap slag, produced
  • by smelting iron ore in shaf t f urnaces; that from R9, however, weighed 2kg and came from the bottoms of bowl furnaces; first- and second-century pottery was collected from the surface in this 6 area. This season 's work has produced several indications that the core communes
  • st i es of the former, was separated from the Ruf f i ac/Carentoir core by the great Bruc 'blank'. Work outside the main season. 19B6—B7 During the past year work has continuée) on other aspects of the project, both field and archivai. Mi cromorphol ogi cal analysis of soi 1
RAP03345.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg-er-Vil : Un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP)
  • opération de terrain réclame à la fois une fouille fine d’un niveau archéologique remarquablement préservé, mais aussi une série de sondages, relevés et prospections aux alentours pour « accrocher » le site à son environnement initial. Une telle opportunité de fouille étendue permet
  • structures du site de Beg-er-Vil découvertes à la base du niveau archéologique, telles que révélées par les fouilles des années 1980 (à l’ouest) et celles de la période 20122015 La fouille de 2016 commence à la bande 43 et s'étend 15 mètres plus à l'est. A l'heure de la rédaction de la
  • uniquement imputable à la granulométrie défavorable du sédiment sableux. La rareté des phytolithes est telle que cette explication ne suffit pas à elle seule. Une insuffisance d’accumulation de végétaux propices (le bois ne contient que d’infimes quantités de phytolithes) est probable
RAP00568.pdf ((56). quatre communes du Morbihan : carentoir)
  • o O o o ,0 , o sherds 0 Fig.S 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100m OO OOO o interesting assemblage (10) of tile and building stone, which suggested that material démoli shed from a substantiel building had been dumped in the ditch. The tile included fragments of floor tile
  • of Fabric. 1 (37), 1 of Fabric 1 each (34, 33 and 43), and none (53, 55, 59, 57). The foundation trenches 18 and 64 had none, but 40 had 5 sherds of Fabric 1. Given the overwhelming prédominance of Fabric 1 in ail contexts with pottery, it is best to treat the assemblage from the site
  • of the relationship between land-use and settlement during the 1 ast two thousand years, took place from 25 August - 1 October in the communes of Ruffiac, Tréal , St-Ni col as-du-Tertre and Carentoir, in the department of Morbihan in eastern Brittany. The ai m of the study is to détermine when
  • /79, H 132, 874, L26, D153) from which 'total' collection had previously been made (fig. 1). Of thèse, A92 had been started in 1986 and remained to finish. The ai rn of thèse smal 1 excavations was the investigation of surf ace/'sub-surf ace rel at i onshi ps; fields were selected
  • five-day planning trips by two in September 1987 and April 1988. The team, consisting of volunteers from a wide range of places, numbered twenty-six, including the directors, one finds assistant and three supervisors; it worked for f i ve weeks from 28 August, with four days off
  • , and only two days were lost because of rain; however , the gênerai dryness meant that the ground was hard and made for very heavy working. EBS 88 B409 (Carentoir Zft 161) B409 lies on a west-facing si ope near the settlement of Le Eiois Guillaume, documentée! from the eighteenth
  • pottery (maximum 5 sherds per square) was more evenly spread. Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile (maximum 0 .5kg per square) were uhevenl y distributed, but tended to concentrate in the south of the field, away from the cl Lister i ng of pre—médiéval and médiéval pottery
  • , and the majority (577.) of the post-medi eval wares was ni neteenth-century . Smal 1 quanti ti es of brick and tile were recovered but only from the first three spits (total 23 fragments, 0. 787kg) . Context 1, however, had in addition to local quartz and quartzite large quantities (120kg
  • some pièces were 5mm across. This layer varied in thickness -from 0.75m on the eastern, up-slope, side o-f the trench to 0.38m on the west. At the east end the top sur-face o-f 2 curved as i -f the layer had been mounded up. This layer could not be total ly excavated over the whole
  • o-f the trench because o-f lack of space for the spoil, so the trench was reduced in size to 6 X 3m. The pottery from this layer (2), like the stone fragments, provides a complète contrast with that of the plough soil. 61 sherds were found, ail of which were Irôn Age, the most
  • . The range o-f pottery recovered -from the top two spits was very différent -from the lowest spit. In the first twenty centimètres 45 sherds were -found; médiéval pottery predominated (837.), -followed by post-medi eval (157.) and a single sherd o-f Roman pottery (27.) ; 52 -fragments o-f
  • -orange clay (24) from the surface of which came 20 sherds of Iron-Age pottery, the majority of which were of Fabrics 86 (607) and 89 (257). There was no sign of feat ures eut into this layer, which 1 ay directly on the degraded, manganèse— stai ned , quartzitic bedrock (05a) (33
  • ) . Comment The occurrence of médiéval and post-medi eval pottery in the plough soil, but not beneath , and the lack of conte;-; ts of thèse période would suggest that this matériel was not deriyed from SLib— surface features. Manuring might wel 1 account for the evenly distributed
  • is a good indicator of settlement in the near vicinity. In the case of the test pit T37 prehistoric pottery was recovered from the surface, but there were no sub-surface features of that date. It is impossible to suggest reasons for the soning of the prehistoric material on the surface
  • without more extensive investigation. The séquence from T36 is important. The trench was sited on the highest part of the field, near the top of the slope, yet it has a much deeper stratification than T37 lower down the slope. The buried soil 32, with its charcoal, might represent
  • Df the material in it, do not however suggest a midden but rather collapsed walls or some sort of bank. The absence of Roman material from the dump suggests that it was formed before the Roman period: the few Roman sherds found in the topsoil could have been derived from a very
  • Roman site in the vicinity, and a few sherds in the topsoil, there is no trace of Roman settlement on this field and little to suggest Roman agricultural use. Présent évidence might suggest that the médiéval pottery in the plough soil derived from very heavy manuring, although
  • the stone in the plough soil of T36 included plenty of introduced building stone, which must have been carried more than 1 km to this spot; this stone, then, may in tact dérive from the collapse of some nearby structure of médiéval date (cf. H132 below). It is just possible
  • Roux) documented from eighteenth and fifteenth centuries respect! vel y , with a possible médiéval structure near T36 (see fig. 2). It is potentially of the highest significance for long—terni settlement history and would merit a much more extensive investigation. A92 (Ruffiac
  • sett 1 ement . In 1986 the plough soil in T2B
RAP02005.pdf ((29). le mésolithique en Bretagne. rapport de projet collectif de recherches)
  • retouchée et s'insère dans un assemblage constitué de plusieurs milliers de pierres taillées. -La réalisation d'une datation par le radiocarbone sur le site de Kerliézoc (Plouvien) visait à apporter d'autres éléments de réponse à la question de l'intégrité du niveau sous le labour. Un
  • Dating Evidence from the Breton Mesolithic Cemeteries of Téviec and Hoëdic. Journal ofAnthropological Archaeology, p. 1-31. YVEN, E et LEOPOLD, P., 2003 - Nouvelle date du Mésolithique moyen breton. Le site de Quillien (Le Cloître-Saint-Thégonnec, Finistère). Livret de la journée
  • ramassées lors du microsondage ont été analysées. Les méthodes de ramassage de même que les opérations de tamisage pratiquées avec des tamis de maçon confèrent à cet assemblage des caractères singuliers qui minimisent les possibilités de comparaison avec les autres sites. Toutefois, même
  • image du caractère lacunaire des assemblages constitués lors des prospections au sol : tous ceux répertoriés comportaient des traces parfois marginales de percussion ou des stigmates, souvent difficilement perceptibles, d'une action anthropique et n'auraient pas été recensés lors
Les premier peuplements de l’ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne (2018) (Les premier peuplements de l’ouest de la France : dépôts pléistocènes et occupations paléolithiques de la région Bretagne. Rapport de PCR 2018)
  • données récentes ; - la base de données Patriarche du SRA croule sous les entités paléolithiques, notamment les découvertes d’objets isolés, rendant presque inutilisables ces informations telles quelles ; - les nombreuses collections issues de prospections depuis plusieurs années n’ont
  • corrodé ; l’oxydation est telle qu’elle interdit bien souvent l’identification (grains indéterminés). 2.3. Les concentrations sporo-polliniques La lecture exhaustive de trois lignes au grossissement x500, complétée par un balayage de la surface de la lamelle à un grossissement moindre
RAP02839.pdf (PLOUEDERN (29). Leslouc'h : une longue occupation de la protohistoire au Moyen Âge. rapport de fouille)
RAP02270.pdf (PLOUHINEC (29). rapport sur la campagne de fouille 2007 du gisement paléolithique inférieur de menez drégan 1. rapport 2007 de fp 3 (2006-2008))
  • occupants de la cavité aient connu une grotte beaucoup plus volumineuse que leurs successeurs, avec en outre un pilier central générant une double entrée. La restitution de ce porche double telle que nous la proposons (figure ci-dessous) est par ailleurs tout à fait en adéquation avec ce
RAP03364.pdf (PLOUGASTEL-DAOULAS (29). Le Rocher de l'Impératrice. Rapport de FP 2014-2016)
  • ................................................................................................................................. 58 13. DATATIONS RADIOCARBONES (N. NAUDINOT ET I. THÉRY-PARISOT) ............................................ 58 14. TEST PALYNOLOGIQUE (E. MESSAGER) ......................................................................................... 62 15. UN ASSEMBLAGE LITHIQUE TRÈS
  • d’incursions ponctuelles (saisonnières ?) de groupes tardiglaciaires sur le Massif armoricain, après un probable abandon de la région au cours du GS-2. L’industrie lithique montre des objectifs de production résolument laminaires. Cet assemblage s’avère particulièrement heuristique afin
  • (probably dedicated to the production of the numerous projectile points found in the assemblage). These cores have probably been taken of the site. If it is too early to be conclusive on this point, like the others few available testimonies for this period in the region, this site would
  • testify of Lateglacial groups limited incursions (seasonal?) into the Armorican Massif after a probable desertion of the region during the GS-2. Lithic production clearly aims the production of blades. This assemblage is particularly interesting in the perspective of studying
  • the nature and rhythm of the techno-economic transformation marking this poorly understand transitional period between Magdalenian and Azilian. Lithic production shows high qualitative standards and exhibits some characteristic clearly inherited from the Magdalenian (production of long
  • assemblage, these artistic productions appear to be caught between the Magdalenian and the Azilian. Various studies allowed: starting proposing hypothesis about technical gestures used to produce these engravings; identify colorants; or identify a probable arrhythmia between technical
  • débitage (soin apporté au détachement, régularité des supports) pourraient toutefois constituer des pistes de réflexion afin de sérier les assemblages. Cette variabilité dans les normes techniques de l’Azilien récent pourrait cependant aussi révéler des spécificités fonctionnelles, ou
  • la présence de cette phase dans le Grand-Ouest (Naudinot, 2010). Le contexte de collecte de cet assemblage à la fin du 19e siècle, notamment sans aucune approche stratigraphique, avait toutefois largement limité la portée de mes analyses. Cette phase de l’Azilien est pourtant
RAP01858.pdf (les sites mésolithiques en Bretagne. rapport de 1re année de projet collectif de recherche)
  • déposés dans de telles sépultures. Pratiques funéraires Un des points forts des travaux de Marthe et Saint-Just Péquart réside dans l'importante minutie consacrée au dégagement des ossements et la grande précision de leurs descriptions. Ceci leur a d'ailleurs permis une analyse
  • disposés en tas pour laisser la place à un second. Puis, « pour celui-là, on s'est simplement contenté de le repousser, afin de ménager une place suffisante à l'ensevelissement du dernier corps. » (Péquart et al, 1937, p. 42). De telles manipulations impliquent que les corps ou les
RAP03187.pdf (QUIBERON (56). Beg er Vil : un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP 2015)
RAP03623 (PLOUHINEC (29). Menez-Dregan I. Des Prénéandertaliens aux Néandertaliens à l'extrême ouest de l'Europe. Rapport de fouille programmée 2018)
RAP03190.pdf (PLOUGASTEL-DAOULAS (29). Le rocher de l'Impératrice. Rapport intermédiaire 2015 de FP 2014-2016)
  • . L’industrie lithique montre des objectifs de production résolument laminaires. Cet assemblage s’avère particulièrement heuristique afin d’enquêter sur la nature et les rythmes des transformations techno-économiques qui marquent cette période charnière si mal connue du Paléolithique entre
  • of the numerous projectile points found in the assemblage). These cores have probably been taken of the site. If it is too early to be conclusive on this point, like the others few available testimonies for this period in the region, this site would testify of Lateglacial groups limited
  • incursions (seasonal?) into the Armorican Massif after a probable desertion of the region during the GS-2. Lithic production clearly aims the production of blades. This assemblage is particularly interesting in the perspective of studying the nature and rhythm of the techno-economic
  • transformation marking this poorly understand transitional period between Magdalenian and Azilian. Lithic production shows high qualitative standards and exhibits some characteristic clearly inherited from the Magdalenian (production of long regular blades, setting up of meticulous production
  • to announced the particular symbolic productions of the Late Azilian. If most of the tablets exhibits geometric engravings, several figurative drawings, including naturalistic ones (aurochs and horses), have been discovered. Like the lithic assemblage, these artistic productions appear